期刊文献+

危机冲击、损失规避与家族大股东支持效应 被引量:10

Crisis Shocks,Loss Aversion and Support Effect of Family Blockholders
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章基于前景理论的"损失规避"假说和"社会情感财富"假说,分析了危机冲击下的家族大股东行为选择动机及其对企业价值的影响。研究结果表明:当危机冲击到来时,家族大股东将家族社会情感财富的维持作为家族企业最主要的决策参照点,此时"损失规避"的家族大股东并未采取"掏空"的行为决策动机,而是发挥比国有大股东更强的支持效应。随着家族大股东持股水平的提升,危机冲击下家族大股东对基于所有权控制积累的"社会情感财富"的损失感知程度越强,在危机期间的家族大股东支持效应越明显;同时,对于处于低成长环境行业背景下的企业,家族大股东对所控制企业的"禀赋效应"更强,更能发挥支持效应,从而帮助企业渡过难关。 Based on the hypotheses of loss aversion and social-emotional wealth in prospect theory, this paper analyzes the motive for behavior choices of family blockholders and its effect on firm value under crisis shocks. It reaches the following conclusions: firstly, faced by crisis shocks, family blockholders regard the maintenance of social-emotional wealth as the most critical decision-making reference in family enterprises~ family block- holders with risk-aversion do not adopt the tunneling behavior decision-mak- ing motive and play a more supportive role than state-owned blockholders. With the increase in the shareholding of family blockholders, perceived de- gree of losses of social-emotional wealth based on the acceleration of owner- ship control by family blockholders is stronger under crisis shocks and the support effect of family blockholders is more significant; in enterprises un- der the low-growth environment industry background, family blcokholders have stronger endowment effects and are more apt to play a supportive role in the solution to the difficulties.
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期122-133,共12页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70872065 71172140) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-08-0804) 上海市曙光计划项目(07SG41) 上海财经大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目(CXJJ-2011-323 CXJJ-2011-371)
关键词 危机冲击 损失规避 社会情感财富 支持效应 crisis shockl loss aversion social-emotional wealth sup- port effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1贺小刚,连燕玲.家族权威与企业价值:基于家族上市公司的实证研究[J].经济研究,2009,44(4):90-102. 被引量:187
  • 2马永强,孟子平.金融危机冲击、企业风险缓冲与政府政策选择[J].会计研究,2009(7):50-56. 被引量:35
  • 3Bai C E, Liu Q, Song F M. Bad news is good news: Propping and tunneling evidence from ChinaS[R]. Working Paper,The University of Hong Kong, 2004.
  • 4Bourgeois Lionel J. On the measurement of organizational slack[J]. Academy of Man- agement Review, 1981,6 (1) : 29- 39.
  • 5Chua J H, Chrisman J J, Sharma P. Defining the family business by behavior[J]. Entre- preneurship Theory and Practice, 1999,23(4) .. 19-39.
  • 6Claessens S,Djankov S, Lang L H P. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000,58(1 - 2) : 81- 112.
  • 7Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences[M]. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
  • 8Cyert Richard M, James G March. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1963.
  • 9David P, Hitt M A, Gimeno J. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R:D[J]. The Academy of Management Journal ,2001,44(1) : 144-157.
  • 10Gillan S L, Starks L T. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000,57 (2) : 275- 305.

二级参考文献60

共引文献220

同被引文献195

引证文献10

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部