摘要
目的比较椎体骨折患者舒适护理与传统护理的护理满意度与护理并发症.方法 34例椎体骨折患者随机分成观察组与对照组,每组17例.观察组给予舒适护理,对照组给予传统的椎体骨折护理.采用护理满意度与护理并发症评估疗效.结果观察组与对照组在护理满意度的比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),分别为(94.1%,82.4%).在护理并发症的发生率上观察组明显低于对照组(3/17,10/17),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论舒适护理能减少椎体骨折护理并发症,促进患者的护理满意度.
Objective To compare the nursing satisfaction and nursing complications of comfort care and conventional care to vertebral fracture patients. Methods 34 patients with vertebral fracture were randomly divided into the observation group and control group, with 17 cases in each group. The observation group was given comfort care, and the control group was given conventional vertebral fracture care. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by nursing satisfaction and nursing complications. Results There was significant difference in the rate of nursing satisfaction between the observation group and the control group （94.1% and 82.4%, respectively） . And the incidence of nursing complications of the observation group were significantly lower than that of the control group （3/17 and 10/17, respectively）. Conclusion Comfort care can reduce the incidence of vertebral fracture nursing complications and improve patients＇ nursing satisfaction.
出处
《昆明医科大学学报》
CAS
2013年第5期173-175,共3页
Journal of Kunming Medical University
关键词
舒适护理
椎体骨折
并发症
满意度
Comfort care
Vertebral fracture
Complications
Satisfaction
