摘要
目的分析和比较封闭式负压吸引技术治疗骨科创伤及感染创面的临床疗效。方法选取2010年3月至2013年3月本院骨科收治的外伤患者56例,作为研究对象。随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组的患者采用封闭式负压吸引技术治疗,对照组患者采用普通骨科常规换药的方法进行治疗,比较两种方法的愈合时间和并发症。结果观察组患者的伤口愈合时间明显整体短于对照组,其中三十天以内愈合的患者观察组比对照组多39.29%,P均<0.05,差异均具有统计学意义。两组患者治疗后,观察组的总副作用比对照组少71.43%,两组比较差异明显,P均<0.05,差异均具有统计学意义。结论采用封闭式负压吸引技术治疗外伤不仅比普通方法愈合速度快而且并发症少,应该在临床广泛推广与应用。
Objective To analyze and compare curative effect of using closed negativepressure wound therapy to treat orthopaedic trauma and wound infection. Methods 56 cases of trauma patients who had been admitted at orthopedics departmet of our hospital from March 2010 to March 2013 as study objectives. Divided them into observation group and control group randomly, adopted closed negativepressure wound therapy to treat observation group＇ s patients,while adopted conventional treatment to control group＇ s patients, compared these two methods＇ healing time and happening situations of complications Results The patients wound healing time was significantly shorter than the control group as a whole, of which less than 30 days to heal patients in obser vation group than the control group more than 39.29%, P 〈 0. 05, differences caere statistically significant. Af ter treatment, the side effects of the observation group was 71.43% less than the control group, the difference was statistically significant （ P 〈 0. 05 ）. Conclusion Closed negativepressure wound therapy＇ s curative effect is better than conventional treatment, and it causes fewer complications, it is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
出处
《中国现代药物应用》
2013年第13期18-19,共2页
Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词
封闭式负压吸引技术
顾客创伤
感染创面
临床疗效
Closed negative-pressure wound therapy
Wound
Wound infection
Clinical curative effect
