期刊文献+

遗产研究的话语视角:理论·方法·展望 被引量:38

The Discursive Approach to Heritage Studies: Theory,Method and Prospect
原文传递
导出
摘要 话语视角的引入为遗产研究带来了新的活力,推动了相关理论、方法、问题意识乃至整个研究范式的创新。近二十年来,国际学术界基于对遗产的表征与建构及其所带来的文化政治问题的思考,探索话语视角下的遗产理论,遗产越来越被理解为一种话语实践;特别是近几年来,学者们进一步将话语分析方法运用到遗产研究中,推动了对遗产运动的反思。这种基于话语视角特别是话语分析方法展开的遗产研究,我们称为"遗产话语研究"。从跨学科和跨文化角度审视,遗产话语研究需要整合不同的话语分析方法,特别是与其他更多学科方法有机结合,重构遗产的文化多样性。在这一领域,中国学者可以深入本土文化传统,探索以本土话语方式陈述、重建自己的遗产,以此参与并引领相关的遗产话语研究。 The emerging of a discursive approach to heritage studies brings to this field new dynamics; it stimulates theoretical, methodological and even paradigmatic innovations in researching heritage issues. During the last two decades, the international academia explores new heritage theories through elucidating how the past is represented, constructed in heritage practices and what cultural politics they whereby engen- der. As such, heritage is increasingly recognized as a form of discursive practice. In more recent years, dis- course analysis as a research method has been further applied in heritage studies, which promotes critical re- flections on the global heritage movement. All these inquiries from the discursive perspective can be collec- tively referred to as "heritage discourse studies". To anticipate the development of heritage discourse studies from the cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural points of view, it is suggested that more integrated discourse analytical research, especially the integration of discourse analysis with other methods are needed for reshap- ing the cultural diversity of heritage. Chinese scholars may dig into their own cultural tradition to explore in- digenous ways of representing and constructing heritage. In this way, they may better engage in and even lead heritage discourse studies.
作者 侯松 吴宗杰
出处 《东南文化》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期6-13,共8页 Southeast Culture
基金 国家社科基金项目(编号:12BMZ046)阶段性成果
关键词 遗产 话语视角 话语分析遗产话语研究 heritage the discursive approach discourse analysis heritage discourse studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Foucault, M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. A. M. Sheridan (trans.). London: Tavistock Publications, 1972, p.107; p.49.
  • 2[法]米歇尔·福柯著 谢强 马月 译.《知识考古学》[M].生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003年版.第25-26页.
  • 3肖锦龙.福柯理论视野中的话语——从《知识考古学》谈起[J].文艺理论研究,2010(5):87-92. 被引量:5
  • 4Hall, S. The work of representation. S. Hall (ed.) Repre- sentation : Cultural Representations and Signifying Practic- es. London: Sage Publications in association with the Open University, 1997, p.45.
  • 5Burr, V. An Introduction to Social Construction (Second Edition). New York: Routledge, 2003, p. 64.
  • 6Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality. R. Hurley (trans.). New York: Pantheon, 1978.
  • 7Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992, pp. 62-73.
  • 8Butler, B. Heritage and the present past. Tilley, C., Keuchler, S. and Rowlands, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage Publications, 2006.
  • 9Bond, G. C. and Gilliam, A. (eds.) Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. London: Rout- ledge, 1994.
  • 10White, H. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1973.

二级参考文献111

共引文献147

二级引证文献220

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部