期刊文献+

双车道公路路侧环境客观安全性评估模型 被引量:6

Assessment Model of Roadside Environment Objective Safety on Two-lane Highway
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了客观评价路侧安全性,从车辆驶入路侧可能性与路侧本体特征安全性两个层次建立路侧环境客观安全性评估模型.将影响路侧安全性的各种路侧本体客观特征指标进行层次划分,在国内外研究成果和一定的调查数据统计分析基础上,确定了各指标安全性等级界定标准,并利用模糊评判方法计算路侧客观特征危险指数.考虑影响车辆侵入路侧的交通组成、线形、路基宽度与路面状况4个客观指标,利用贝叶斯网络方法计算车辆侵入路侧概率.以路侧客观特征危险指数作为X轴,车辆侵入路侧概率作为Y轴构成的平面区域基础上,利用模型综合评价指标作为定量指标进行安全等级划分.研究成果可为路侧安全改进工程方案提供决策依据. For an objective evaluation of roadside safety, assessment model of roadside environment objective safety was established based on the probability of run-into-roadside and the roadside objective characteristics. First, the indicators of the various objective characteristics that affect roadside safety were hierarchically divided, and each indicator safety level were determined on the basis of domestic and overseas research results and certain statistics data. The risk index of the roadside objective characteristics was calculated by fuzzy judgment. Then, the probability of run-into-roadside which considers objective indicators about traffic composition, highway alignment, subgrade width and pavement conditionwas calculated by Bayesian Networks. Finally, based on planar region which was composed by the risk index as X-axis and the enforcement probability as Y-axis, roadside objective safety level was divided by comprehensive evaluation indicator. The results can provide decision for roadside safety improvement program.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期1025-1030,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 交通运输部西部交通建设科技项目(2009318785009) 山西省交通厅科技项目(2010-07)
关键词 双车道公路 路侧环境 模糊评判 贝叶斯网络 (BN) 客观安全性 two-lane highway roadside environment fuzzyjudgment Bayesian Networks(BN) objective safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1郑恒,李长城,刘煜.基于贝叶斯网络的路侧安全评价方法[J].公路交通科技,2008,25(2):139-144. 被引量:24
  • 2Harwood W D, Council M F, Hauer E, et al. Prediction of the expected safety performance of rural two-lane highways[R]. Washington D C: Federal Highway Administration, 2000.
  • 3李长城.路侧安全灰色聚类评估方法研究[C]//交通部公路司.2004国际公路安全研讨会论文集.北京:人民交通出版社,2005:239-247.
  • 4Transportation Research Board. Roadside safety analysis program (RSAP) engineer's manual[R]. Washington D C.. NCHRP Report 492,2003.
  • 5AASHTO. Roadside design guide [R]. Washington D C.. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2002.
  • 6游克思,孙璐,顾文钧.山区公路路侧安全定量化评价[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2010,8(3):49-55. 被引量:15
  • 7Cooper, P. Analysis of roadside encroachments-single-vehicle run-off-road accident data analysis for five provinces [ R]. Vancouver: B C Research, 1980.
  • 8Perchonok K, Ranney T A, Baum A S, et al. Hazardous effects of highway features and roadside objects[R]. Washington D C: Federal Highway Administration, 1978.

二级参考文献17

共引文献30

同被引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部