摘要
通过分析奥运会特别仲裁管辖权裁决的相关规则和案例,结合对国际商事仲裁自裁管辖权理论内涵和发展趋势的解读,认为,奥运会特别仲裁机构管辖权裁决的效力尚不具有应然的准终局性,但在实践中已形成在对事、对人、对时方面的诸多成熟规则,只要加以完善,有可能事实上在CAS框架内实现管辖权自裁决定的终局效果。为此,应加强仲裁主体对管辖权的主动审查职权,提高管辖权裁决在法理上的一致性,在管辖权的自由裁量空间内应注重对运动员和体育利益的保护。
Analysis of the rules and jurisprudence on jurisdiction of CAS Olympic Games＇ Division, and of the con tent and development of the Competence/Competence Principle in international commercial arbitration showed that although the effect of jurisdiction ruling by CAS Olympic Games＇ Ad. Hoe Division has not been finalized as it should be, in practices of jurisprudence, mature standards have been established concerning material jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction and temporal jurisdiction. To consummate these standards, there exist approaches to factual fi nality of the jurisdiction ruling in the framework of CAS. For the sake of consummation of these standards, it is im portant to strengthen the arbitral review on its jurisdiction ex officio, to enhance the consistency in jurisdiction rul ings, and to highlight the protection for rights of athletes and interests of sports within the discretion at arbitral juris diction.
出处
《武汉体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第7期37-44,74,共9页
Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金
2011年度国家社科基金项目"国际体育仲裁程序机制专题研究"(11CFX076)
关键词
国际体育仲裁院
体育仲裁
奥运会
管辖权
自裁管辖
Court of Arbitration for Sports
sports arbitration
Olympic Games
jurisdiction
principle of compe-tence/competence
