期刊文献+

加速康复外科理念指导腹腔镜胃癌根治术临床价值研究 被引量:29

Fast track surgery in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的重点观察在加速康复外科(FTS)新理念指导下行腹腔镜胃癌根治术的安全性和有效性。方法对2008-2011年南京军区南京总医院120例胃癌手术病人的临床资料进行回顾性对照研究。将择期胃癌手术病人分为3组,每组40例。A组采取传统的围手术期处理方法行剖腹手术;B组应用FTS理念行剖腹手术;C组应用FTS理念行腹腔镜手术。比较3组病人手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、术后开始下床时间、肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、并发症和住院费用等。结果 C组病人术中出血量明显减少(P<0.01),但手术时间明显延长(P<0.01),治疗费用显著增加(P<0.01)。3组间淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义。C组与A组比较,病人术后肠功能恢复时间显著提前(P<0.01),术后住院时间明显缩短(P<0.01)。C组与B组比较,病人肠功能恢复时间和术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在FTS理念指导下应用腹腔镜行胃癌手术,可缩短术后住院时间,加快肠功能恢复。但与FTS剖腹手术相比,优势并不十分明显。 Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fast track surgery in ]aparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients with gastric cancer performed gastrectomy between 2008 and 2011 in Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command PLA were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received elective gastric cancer resection, and were divided into three groups: group A (open gastrectomy, n=40) , group B (open gastrectomy with fast track surgery, n=40) and group C ( laparoscopic gastrectomy with fast track surgery, n=40). The clinical data and gut function were assessed in three groups. Results There were no significant differences in postoperative complication and the number of lymph node harvest between 3 groups. Blood loss was less in group C than group A and group B (P〈0.01) , but its operative time was longer and its cost was more than other two open surgery groups (P〈0.01). Recovery of bowel function in group C was faster, and postoperative hospital stay was shorter than group A (P〈0.01). However, recovery of bowel function and postoperative hospital stay in group C were not different from group B (P〉0.05). Conclusion Postoperative hospital stay can be shorter and recovery of bowel function can be faster in laparoscopic gastrectomy with fast track surgery plan compared with traditional care group. But when using fast track surgery plan, laparoscopic gastrectomy is not superior to open surgery.
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期587-589,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
基金 江苏省社会发展基金资助(BS2007054) 南京军区科技创新基金资助(07Z028)
关键词 胃癌 加速康复外科 腹腔镜 gastric cancer fast track surgery laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Goh PM, Khan AZ, So JB, et al. Early experience with lapa- roscop ic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2001, 11 (2) : 832-887.
  • 2江志伟,黎介寿,汪志明,李宁,柳欣欣,李伟彦,朱四海,刁艳青,佴永军,黄小静.胃癌患者应用加速康复外科治疗的安全性及有效性研究[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(19):1314-1317. 被引量:242
  • 3腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南(2007版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(6):476-480. 被引量:277
  • 4Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced re- covery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for pa- tients undergoing colonic resection [J]. Clin Nutr, 2005, 24(3): 466-477.
  • 5黎介寿.对Fast-track Surgery(快通道外科)内涵的认识[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(8):515-517. 被引量:366
  • 6江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1355
  • 7Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence based surgical care and the evolution of fast track surgery [J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(2): 159-198.
  • 8Maring BJ, Winter DC, McGreal G, et al. Nasogastrie mtubarion cants gastroarnphageal reflex in patients undergoing elective lap- arotomy[J].Surgery, 2001, 130(5): 788.
  • 9Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decom- pression after abdominal surgery [Jl.Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, 25(1):4929.
  • 10Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D. Prospective randomized clini- cal trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection [J ]. Ann Surg,2001,234(4) : 487-493.

二级参考文献52

  • 1江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1355
  • 2Basse L, Hjort JD, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection[ J]. Ann Surg,2000,232 (1) :51 -57.
  • 3Fearon KC,Ljungqvist O,Von Meyenfeldt M,et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection [ J ]. Clin Nutr,2005,24 ( 3 ) : 466 - 477.
  • 4Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg,2002,183(6) :630.
  • 5Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagor A J, et al. Prospective, randomised, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care. after laparotomy and intestinal resection [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum,2003,46 ( 7 ) :851 - 859.
  • 6Anderson ADG,McNaught CE,McFie J, et al. Randomised clinical trial of muhimodal optimisation and standard preoperative surgical care[J].Br J Surg,2003.90(12) :1497 -1504.
  • 7Basse L,Thorbol JE, Lossb K,et al. Convalesenee after fast-track versus conventional care of colonic surgery [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 204,47 ( 3 ) :275 - 278.
  • 8Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al. Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2004, 18 (8) : 1163 - 1185.
  • 9The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2004,350(20) :2050 -2059.
  • 10Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma : prospective randomised trial [ J ]. Lancet,2004,363(9416) :1187 -1197.

共引文献2060

同被引文献253

引证文献29

二级引证文献463

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部