摘要
在刑事诉讼公正与效率价值下,庭前会议兼具负担控辩双方资讯平等、规范公诉权行使、保障集中审理与促进程序分流的功能。但2012年新通过的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(下称"新刑诉法")中有关庭前会议的规定尚显粗疏,一定程度上限制了其作用的发挥。实践中需明确庭前会议对重大复杂案件避免庭前预断的功能,赋予控辩双方召开会议的启动权,坚持不将实体性争议带入庭前会议,同时分情况看待庭前会议中所做决定的权限与效力,使庭前会议程序发挥应有的功能。
The criminal procedure has two values - justice and efficiency. The pretrial conference has the function of realizing information equality, hearing and promoting procedure division. regulating the exercise of right of public prosecution, ensuring centralized But the provisions on the pretrial conference program in the new criminal procedure law passed in 2012 are still sketchy, which limits its role to some extent. In practice, we should clear the function of the pretrial conference to avoid pretrial anticipation, give the right to start the program to both sides, and insist that substantive disputes should not be brought to the pretrial conference. Meanwhile, we should look the authority and effectiveness of the decision made in the pretrial conference respectively, and make the pretrial conference program play its proper role.
出处
《湖北职业技术学院学报》
2013年第2期84-87,57,共5页
Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute
关键词
庭前会议
规范建构
适用
pretrial conference
regulation construction
application
