期刊文献+

胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术学习曲线分析 被引量:10

Learning curve of combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术的学习曲线。方法回顾性分析2010年4月至2011年12月由同一治疗组医师完成的144例胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术。按照手术日期先后顺序分为A、B、C、D4组,每组36例。比较各组患者的手术时间,术中出血量,淋巴结清扫个数,中转开放手术率,并发症率,住院时间及手术频度,分析不同阶段的手术效果。结果4组患者在年龄、性别、肿瘤侵犯深度,肿瘤位置,中转开放手术率,并发症发生率及手术后住院时问等方面差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。A组手术时间为(339.1±56.5)min,显著长于B组(240.7±58.2)min、C组(255.4±45.7)min和D组(269.9±45.4)min,P〈0.05。A组的术中失血量为(218.6±142.9)min,显著多于B组(106.4±76.0)min、C组(75.5±48.7)min和D组(100.5±91.9)min,P〈0.05。B、C、D三组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。A组清扫淋巴结的个数为(10.6±5.6)个,显著少于B组(15.6±7.7)个、C组(18.3±6.9)个和D组(18.4±8.7)个,(P〈0.05)。B、C、D三组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。手术频度由A组的3.9例/月上升到B组的14.4例/月、C组的11.1例/月、D组的10.6例/月,并趋于稳定。结论胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术学习曲线大约为36例。 Objective Minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE) is accepted as standard surgery for treatment of esopha- geal carcinoma. This study investigated the learning curve of Combining thoracoscopy and laparscopy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 144 cases of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy performed by the same surgical team. In order of the dates of surgery, the patients were equally divided into groups A, B, C, and D. Comparisons were made among the four groups in operation time,blood loss, number of lymph nodes re- sected ,rate of conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications , postoperative hospital stay, and frequency of surgery. Results No significant differences were found "in age, sex, T stage, tumor location, rate of conversion to open surgery, rate of postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay among the five groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). The operation time was signifi- cantly longer in group A than in B, C and D [ ( 339.1 ± 56.5 ) min vs. ( 240.7 ± 58.2 ) rain, ( 255.4 ± 45.7 ) rain and (269.9 ±45.4) min,P 〈0.05, and 5]. The blood loss in surgery was significantly more in group A than the other three groups [ (18.6 ±142.9 ml vs. (106.4 ±76.0) ml, (75.5 ±48.7) ml and (100.5 ±91.9) ml,P 〈0.05]. The number of lymph nodes resected was significantly less in group A than the other three groups [ ( 10.6 ± 5.6) vs. ( 15.6 ± 7.7 ), ( 18.3 ± 6.9 ) and ( 18.4 ± 8.7 ), P 〈 0.05 ]. The frequency of surgery was increased from 3.9 eases a month in group A to 14.4, 11.1 and 10.6 cases a month in B, C and D. Conclusion The learning curve of combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageetomy for esophageal carcinoma is about 36 cases.
出处 《中华胸心血管外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期354-357,共4页 Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 胸腔镜 腹腔镜 食管癌 学习曲线 Thoracoscopy Laparoscopy Esophageal carcinoma Learning Curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Pellegrini C, Wetter LA, Patti M, et al. Thoracoscopic esophago- myotomy. Initial experience with a new approach for the treannent of achalasia. Ann Surg, 1992,216:291-296.
  • 2Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg,2000,70:906-911.
  • 3刘晟,仇明,江道振,郑向民,沈宏亮.微创手术学习曲线的新概念与临床意义[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(1):5-6. 被引量:59
  • 4Melfi FM, Mussi A. Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin, 2008,18:289-295.
  • 5Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy?. Am Surg,1995 ,61:681-685.
  • 6Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. Learning curve of video- assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17:515-519.
  • 7Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg, 2008, 248:1081-1091.
  • 8许建功,蔡瑞君,王禹冰,王武军.胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌根治术学习曲线研究[J].中国全科医学,2012,15(6):631-634. 被引量:29
  • 9张仁泉,葛威,康宁宁,潘华光,王云海,左剑辉,刘伟,陈安国,夏万里.食管癌外科治疗中联合腔镜的应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2012,28(5):268-270. 被引量:23

二级参考文献26

共引文献107

同被引文献108

  • 1Fernando A Herbella,Marco G Patti.Minimally invasive esophagectomy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(30):3811-3815. 被引量:11
  • 2宋平平,李辉,刘希斌,张永明,郭洪波,罗景玉,张为迪,张百江.直线型切割缝合器行管状胃成形在胸段食管癌手术中的应用[J].山东医药,2009,49(52):53-54. 被引量:11
  • 3梁伟民,俞洁璐,张洁.不同方法判断双腔支气管插管位置的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):183-184. 被引量:25
  • 4朱成楚,陈仕林,叶中瑞,郭剑波,叶敏华,马德华,叶加洪.电视胸腔镜下食管癌切除及疗效分析(附120例报道)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2006,22(6):364-365. 被引量:37
  • 5Wolff BG, Pembeton JH, Van Heerden JA, et al. Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial[ J ]. Ann Surg, 1989,209:670-673.
  • 6Pearl ML, Valea FA, Fischer M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1996,88 : 399-402.
  • 7Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2010,252 : 292- 298.
  • 8Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer [J]. Eur J CardiothoracSurg, 2009,35 : 13-20.
  • 9Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients [J] Ann Surg, 2003,238:486-495.
  • 10Schwartz CI, Heyman AS, Rao AC. Prophylactic nasogastric tube decompression: is its use justified? [J]. South Med J, 1995,88 : 825-830.

引证文献10

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部