偏好的性别差异研究:基于实验经济学的视角被引量：25

导出

摘要本文通过实验的方法,采用相对较为合理的实验结构,在经济学框架下对个体风险偏好和社会偏好的性别差弄进行了较为系统的研究。研究结果表明,与国外大多数研究发现男女偏好在各方面存在显著差异不同的是,中国被试对于风险偏好不存在显著差并,社会偏好方面的差异也比较小,并且男性风险中性个体所占比例要高于女性,男性中自私的个体所占比例要高于女性。我们还同时对影响个体风险偏好和社会偏好的其他一些因素进行了计量分析,得到了一些比较有趣的结论,如经济学专业的个体具有更低的优势不平等厌恶偏好和利他偏好等。

作者周业安左聪颖袁晓燕

机构地区中国人民大学经济学院陕西师范大学国际商学院复旦大学经济学院

出处《世界经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期3-27,共25页 The Journal of World Economy

基金国家社科基金项目"社会偏好理论与社会合作机制研究"(12BJL039) 北京大学-林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心研究基金资助项目"受教育程度劳动时间配置及城镇女性福利水平比较" 陕西师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"性别差异的行为及实验经济学研究"(11SZYB42)的阶段性研究成果

关键词社会偏好偏好的性别差异实验经济学

分类号 F069.9 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献70

1袁晓燕(2012).《学得多,干得更多?--不同受教育程度女性双重负担比较》,复旦大学经济学院工作论文.
2袁晓燕(2013).《重工业优先发展与女性偏好逆转》,复旦大学经济学院工作论文.
3周业安,宋紫峰.公共品的自愿供给机制:一项实验研究[J].经济研究,2008,43(7):90-104. 被引量：61
4周业安,左聪颖,陈叶烽,连洪泉,叶航.具有社会偏好个体的风险厌恶的实验研究[J].管理世界,2012,28(6):86-95. 被引量：63
5Aitmann, S. ; Dohmen, T. ; and Wibral, M. "Do the reciprocal trust less ?" Economics letter, 2008, 99(3), pp. 454-457.
6Andreoni, J. "Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments. " Journal of Public Eco- nomics, 1988, 37(3), pp.291-304.
7Andreoni, J. and Miller, J. "Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Prefer- ences for A!.truism. " Econometrica, 2002, 70(2) , pp.737-753.
8Arano, K. ; Parker, C. and Terry,R. "Gender-Based Risk Aversion and Retirement Asset Allocation. " Eco- nomic Inquiry, 2010, 48(1), pp. 147-155.
9Arch, E. C. "Risk-Taking: A Motivational Basis for Sex Differences. " Psychological Reports, 1993, 73, pp. 6-11.
10Banerjee,Abhijit and Duflo, Ester. "The Experimental Approach to DeveLopment Economics. "Annual Review of Economics ,2009,1. pp. 1-28.

二级参考文献85

1Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
2Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
3Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
4Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.
5Kurzban, R., and Houser, D., 2005, “Experiments Investigating Cooperative Types in Humans: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulations”, PNAS, 102: 1803-1807.
6Laury, S.K., Walker, J.M., and Williams A.W., 1999, "The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good with Diminishing Marginal Returns", Public Choice, 99: 139-160.
7Ledyard, J.O., 1995, “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research” in Kagel, J.H., and Roth, A.E., (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8Levy-Garboua, L., Meidinger, C., and Rapoport, B., 2006, “The Formation of Social Preferences: Some Lessons from Psychology and Biology”, in S. Kolm and Jean Mercier Ythier (ed.), 2006, Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, volume 1, Elsevier.
9Marwell, G. and Ames, R., 1979, “Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods 1: Resources, Interest, Group Size, and the Free-rider Problem”, American Journal of Sociology, 84 : 1335-1360.
10Mueller, D.C., 2003, Public Choice Ⅲ, Cambridge University Press; 3 edition.