摘要
所谓物象化,是指人与人之间的社会关系颠倒为事物与事物之间的关系,而物化则是指,事物之间的关系进一步颠倒为物的自然属性。这是两种不同的逻辑:物象化只是最初层级的颠倒,物化则是对前者颠倒的进一步颠倒。而拜物教范畴在客体维度上不仅包括物象化过程,而且还包括物化过程,是两者的合一。除此之外,拜物教还包括主体维度上的内涵,即资本主义生产当事人在观念层面上把这种物象化和物化过程当作真理接受下来。在《大纲》中,马克思虽然看到了拜物教与物象化、物化的内在关系,但他并没有揭示拜物教产生的真正根源,而是将其定位为一种理论错认,也没有从主体维度深层挖掘拜物教批判理论与文化霸权理论之间的内在关系,更没有找到解构拜物教的科学之路。这些缺陷的产生,是与《大纲》对资本主义生产方式的片面认识联系在一起的。而《资本论》则在上述两个问题上均完成了对《大纲》的超越与发展。
＂Die Versachlichung＂ refers to the process that subject＇s relations are inverted into relations between ＂die Sachen＂, while ＂die Verdinglichung＂ could be defined as the inversion of relation between ＂die Sachen＂ into the natural attribute of ＂das Ding＂. The later is the further development of the former. In object dimension, ＂der Fetischismus＂ includes the two processes. Besides this, ＂der Fetischismus＂ also implies that the agents will accept the processes of ＂die Versachlichung＂ and ＂die Verdinglichung＂, and consider them as the truth in their daily consciousness. In Grundrisse, although Marx realized the relations between der Fetischismus and die Versachlichung , die Verdinglichung, he neither scientifically interpreted the essence of der Fetischismus, nor deeply revealed the real relation of der Fetischismus and cultural hegemony. Above all, he did not find the actual way of deconstructing der Fetischismus. These defects were closely connected with his one-sided understanding of capitalist mode of production in Grundrisse. Marx realized the development and transcension in the both aspects in Capital.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第7期51-58,共8页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"<资本论>及其手稿中的历史唯物主义思想再研究"(12CZX002)
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"马克思社会再生产理论与历史唯物主义的创新研究"(11YJC720038)的阶段性成果
关键词
物象化
物化
拜物教《大纲》《资本论》
资本主义生产方式
versachlichung, verdinglichung, fetischismus, Grundrisse, Capital, capitalist mode of pro duction
