期刊文献+

认知-存在团体对社区慢性精神分裂症患者的干预效果 被引量:9

Efficacy of Cognitive-existential Group Intervention of Chronic Schizophrenics in Community
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨认知-存在干预对社区慢性精神分裂症患者的康复疗效。方法将30例日间康复照料机构的慢性精神分裂症患者随机分为干预组(n=15)和对照组(n=15),干预组予以认知-存在团体干预,对照组仅予一般的社区随访。在干预前后分别采用自尊量表(SES)、一般健康问卷(GHQ-20)、生命意义源量表(SML)、生命意义感量表(MLQ)进行评定。结果干预前两组SES、GHQ-20、SML、MLQ评分差异无显著性;干预后,干预组GHQ-20、SML、MLQ总分高于对照组(t=3.05,3.08,2.58;P均<0.05);干预组GHQ-20中抑郁和自我肯定两项因子评分高于对照组(t=2.45,3.17;P均<0.05);干预组SML中自我超越意义因子评分明显高于对照组(t=3.99,P<0.001);干预组MLQ中追寻意义感因子评分明显高于对照组(t=3.77,P<0.001)。结论认知-存在团体对社区慢性精神分裂症患者降低抑郁水平、提升自我肯定、意义感,促进病人康复有积极作用。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of cognitive-existential group intervention of chronic schizophrenics in community.Methods A total of 30 schizophrenic patients in community rehabilitation day services were randomly divided into intervention group and control group,receiving either cognitive-existential group intervention or general community follow-up.Before and after the intervention,all patients were assessed by Self-Esteem Scale(SES),General Health Questionnaire(GHQ20),scale for Sources of Meaning in life(SML)and scale for Meaning in Life Questionnaire(MLQ).Results The total score and factor scores of SES,GHQ-20,SML MLQ had no significant differences between two groups before intervention;At the end of the intervention,the total scores of GHQ-20,SML,MLQ in intervention group increased much more than those in control group(t=3.05,3.08,2.58;P0.05);GHQ-20 factor scores of depression and sense of adequacy in intervention group increased than those in control group(t=2.45,3.17;P0.05);The self-transcendence factor score of SML was significantly higher in intervention group than control group(t=3.99,P0.001);MLQ factor score of search for meaning in intervention group increased much more than that in control group(t=3.77,P0.001).Conclusion For patients with schizophrenia,cognitive-existential group intervention has some positive effect on relieving the level of depression,improving self-affirmation and meaning and promoting the rehabilitation.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第7期974-977,共4页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 "2012年上海高校教师产学研践习计划"项目资助 上海市教委社会工作教学实习服务基地建设项目
关键词 认知-存在 团体干预 慢性精神分裂症患者 对照研究 Cognitive-existential Group intervention Chronic schizophrenics Controlled studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Bechdolf A,Kohn D,Knost B,et al.A randomized comparison ofgroup cognitive-behavioral therapy and group psycho education inacute patients with schizophrenia:Outcome at 24 months[J].ActaPsychiatry Scandinavica,2005,112(3):21-28.
  • 2Rector,Neil A,Beck,Aaron T.Cognitive behavioral therapy forschizophrenia:An empirical review[J].Journal of Nervous&Men-tal Disease,2012,200(10):832-839.
  • 3李鸣.存在主义心理治疗(上)[J].临床精神医学杂志,1999,9(2):115-116. 被引量:4
  • 4Corrie S,Milton M.The relationship between existential-phe-nomenological and cognitive-behavior therapies[J].Psychothera-py,Counseling and Healthy,2000(1):7-24.
  • 5Kissane D W,Bloch S,Smith G C,et al.Cognitive-existential grouppsychotherapy for women with primary breast cancer:A randomizedcontrolled trial[J].Psycho-oncology,2003,12(6):532-546.
  • 6Holland J C,Andersen B,Breitbart W S,et al.Distress management[J].The Official Journal of National Comprehensive Cancer Net-work,2010(8):448-485.
  • 7Collins A L,Bloch S,Annette F,et al.Cognitive existential coupletherapy for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients and their part-ners:A descriptive pilot study[J].Psycho-oncology,2011,10(2):10-15.
  • 8Andresen R,Oades L,Caputi P.The experience of recovery fromschizophrenia:Towards an empirically validated stage model[J].Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,2003,37(5):586-594.
  • 9中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:108-1150.
  • 10刘华清 张培炎 尚兰.精神分裂症的自知力:"自知力与治疗态度问卷表"的应用[J].上海精神医学,1995,7(3):158-158.

二级参考文献65

共引文献873

同被引文献83

引证文献9

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部