期刊文献+

用TOPSIS综合评价小麦种质资源对麦长管蚜的抗虫性 被引量:8

TOPSIS Based Comprehensive Evaluation of the Resistance in Wheat Germplasm to English Grain Aphid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以107份小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)种质资源为材料,分析了各基因型的抗麦长管蚜特征,共发现1份高抗材料和19份中抗材料。另外,对各供试材料的分蘖数、千粒重、抽穗期等10个小麦农艺性状指标进行了调查。经相关性检验发现,分蘖数和株高均与抗虫指数和抗虫级别呈极显著负相关。综合抗虫指数、抗虫级别和10个小麦农艺性状共12个特征数据进行TOPSIS分析,结果发现,来自伊朗的小麦品种PI 623081表现最好,其次是华麦8号、黔麦15和PI 634770等,新麦19的表现最差。研究结果对小麦的抗虫育种工作具有极其重要的指导意义。 In this study,107 wheat cultivars/accesses were evaluated for resistance to English grain aphid.Only one genotype displayed high resistance and nineteen genotypes showed middle resistance.Ten agronomic traits including tiller number,plant height and heading date were investigated.The relationships between agronomic traits and resistance of wheat germplasm to English grain aphid were studied.The results revealed that resistance was significantly negatively correlated with tiller number and plant height.Resistance index,resistance scale and ten comprehensive agronomic traits were ranked with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS).Results illustrated that Iranian cultivar PI 623081 was in first place,followed by Huamai 8,Qianmai 15 and PI 634770 in second place.Xinmai 19 was ranked last.This study provides valuable information for wheat aphid resistance breeding programs.
出处 《植物科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期228-241,共14页 Plant Science Journal
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(2009CB118300)
关键词 小麦 麦长管蚜 抗虫性 TOPSIS Wheat English grain aphid Resistance TOPSIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Johnston R L, Bishop B. Economic injury levels and e- conomic thresholds for cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on spring planted wheatJ. J Econ Ento- mol, 1987, 80: 478-482.
  • 2Watt A. The effect of cereal growth stages on the re- productive activity of Sitobion avenue and Metopolo- phium dirhodum J. Ann Appl Biol, 1979, 91 (2): 147- 157.
  • 3Maudsley M J, Mackenzie A, Thacker J I, et al. Den- sity dependence in cereal aphid populations [J. Ann Appl Biol, 1996, 128(3) : 453-463.
  • 4Wang C P, Chen Q, Luo K, et al. Evaluation of re- sistance in wheat germplasm to the aphids (Sitobion avenae) based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and cluster meth- ods EJ. AfrJAgrRes, 2011, 6(6): 1592- 1599.
  • 5Longley M, Jepson P C. Effects of honeydew and insecticide residues on the distribution of foraging aphid parasitoids under glasshouse and field conditions EJ. Entomol Exp Appl, 1996, 81(2) : 189- 198.
  • 6杨益众,印毅,王红,余月书.蜂蜜模拟麦蚜蜜露危害对小麦产量和主要营养品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(1):268-271. 被引量:13
  • 7Budenberg W, Powell W, Clark S. The influence of a- phids and honeydew on the leaving rate of searching a- phid parasitoids from wheat plants EJ. Entomol Exp Appl, 1992, 63(3) : 259- 264.
  • 8Lee G, Stevens D, Stokes S, Wratten S. Duration of cereal aphid populations and the effects on wheat yield and quality [J. Ann Appl Biol, 1981, 98(2) : 169- 178.
  • 9Fereres A, Gutierrez C, Del E P, et al. Impact ot the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (F.) ( Ho- moptera: Aphididae), on the yield of wheat plants subjected to water deficits E J. Environ Entomol, 1988, 17(3) : 596- 602.
  • 10Zhou C J, Cheng J L, et al. Evaluation on the resist- ance to aphids of wheat germplasm resources in China EJ. Afr J Biotechnol, 2011, 10(63) : 13929- 13935.

二级参考文献73

共引文献87

同被引文献199

引证文献8

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部