期刊文献+

DNA定量分析和高危型HPV-DNA检测在ASCUS分流诊断中的意义 被引量:15

Significance of DNA Quantitative Cytology and High-risk HPV-DNA Test in ASCUS Triage Diagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨细胞DNA定量分析和高危型HPV-DNA定量检测在未明确意义非典型鳞状上皮细胞(atypical squamous cells of undetermined signification,ASCUS)诊断分流中的意义。方法 DNA定量分析组:193例行DNA定量分析;高危型HPV-DNA检测组:134例行高危型HPV-DNA检测。巴氏(the Bethesda system,TBS)系统诊断为ASCUS的327例患者均行阴道镜检及镜下活检。结果 327例ASCUS中,阴道镜活检病理诊断为炎症者204例(62.39%),CINⅠ70例(21.41%),CINⅡ13例(3.98%),CINⅢ30例(9.17%),宫颈癌10例(3.05%)。高危型HPV-DNA检测组和DNA定量分析组之间阴道镜活检病理检查结果比较差异无统计学意义。DNA定量分析和HPV-DNA检测预测CINⅡ及以上的阴性预测值分别为98.93%和94.74%。每100个被测细胞数中异倍体细胞不同百分比比较,<0.1%和≥0.1%的阴道镜活检结果差异有统计学意义。≥3个DNA异倍体预测CINⅡ及以上病理改变,其敏感度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为80.64%、47.06%、40.99%、84.21%。结论 DNA定量分析和高危型HPV-DNA检测可用于ASCUS的分流,但DNA定量分析更经济。 Objective To explore the significance of DNA quantitative cytology and High-risk HPV-DNA testing in ASCUS riage diagnosis. Methods The DNA quantitative cytology group included 193 cases and the high-risk HPV-DNA comprises 134 cases. ASCUS diagnosed by TBS undergone with automatic cell turnout check analysis system or High-risk HPV-DNA test later, were both done colposcopy directed biopsy soon. There was a comparison between these two cases in pathological results. Results Of the 327 ASCUS cases, 204 cases were histologically diagnosed as inflammation (62. 39%), 70 cases were CIN I (21.41%), 13 cases were CINⅡ(3. 98%), 30 cases were CIN Ⅲ (9. 17%),and 10 cases were cervical invasive cancer (3.05 %). The histological diagnosis were no statistical distinction between HR- HPV-DNA and DNA Quantitative cytology groups. The negative predictive values of HPV-DNA and DNA Quantitative cytology were 94. 74% and 98. 93%, respectively. Compared with the percentage of DNA amount greater than 5C (DNA Index〉2. 5) cells, the histological diagnosis were significantly dif-ferent between 〈0. 1% and ≥0. 10/60 . DNA heteroploid more than or equal to three were used to predict CIN II or more severe pathological changes, and its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values were 80. 64%, 47. 06%, 40. 99%, 84. 21 %, respectively. Conclusion DNA Quantitative cytology and High-risk HPV-DNA test can be used for ASCUS triage , but the cost of DNA Quantitative cytology is cheaper than High-risk HPV-DNA test.
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期671-674,共4页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
关键词 未明确意义非典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASCUS) 细胞DNA定量分析 高危型HPV-DNA检测 阴道镜 Atypical squamous cells of undetermined signification DNA quantitative cytology High-riskHPV-DNA test Colposcopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Montz FJ,Monk BJ, Fowler JM, et al. Natural history of theminimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear[J]. Obstet Gyne- col, 1992, 80(3 Pt 1): 385-8.
  • 2NCCN. Org. Cervival Cancer Screening version 2. 2012 [S]. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Oncology (NCCN Guide- lines) ,2012,5 : 10.
  • 3刘霞,霍云龙,张淑兰.宫颈细胞学ASCUS诊断的临床意义及处理[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,25(13):1750-1752. 被引量:12
  • 4Cox JT, Lorincz AT, Schiffman MH, et al. Human papillo mavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in tria- ging women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,172(3) : 946-54.
  • 5孙小蓉,汪键,Alfred Boecking.DNA倍体分析系统用于宫颈癌及上皮内瘤变的诊断及预测[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(7):435-437. 被引量:60
  • 6孙小蓉,汪键.DNA定量细胞学的研究[M].武汉:湖北科技出版社,2006:58.

二级参考文献33

  • 1孙小蓉,李玉兰,车东媛,晏想成,凌慧芳,凃洪章,汪键.用细胞DNA定量分析方法进行宫颈癌普查的临床研究[J].诊断病理学杂志,2005,12(1):12-16. 被引量:67
  • 2Schiffman M, Solomon D. Findings to date from the ASCUS - LSIL triage study (ALTS) [J] . Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2003, 127 (8): 946.
  • 3Molden T, Nygatrd JF, Kraus I, et al. Predicting CIN^2 + when detecting HPV mRNA and DNA by pretect HPV - proofer and consensus PCR : a 2 - year follow - up of women with ASCUS or LSIL pap smear [J]. Int JCancer, 2005, 114 (6): 973.
  • 4Solomon D, Davey, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology [J]. JAMA, 2002, 287 (16): 2114.
  • 5National Cancer Institute Workshop. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical vaginal diagnosis [J]. JAMA, 1989, 262 (7) : 931.
  • 6Renshaw AA, Deschenes M, Auger M. ASC/SIL ratio for cytotechnologists: a surrogate marker of screening sensitivity[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 131 (6): 776.
  • 7Nayar R, Tabbara SO. Atypical squamous cells: update on current concepts [J]. Clin Lab Med, 2003, 23 (3) : 605.
  • 8Jones HW. Clinical treatment of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance cervical cytology [J].Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 43 (2) : 381.
  • 9Apgar BS, Kiuendorf AL, Bettcher CM, et al. Update on ASCCP consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical screening tests and cervical histology[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2009, 80 (2) : 147.
  • 10Liu S, Semenciw R, Probert A, et al. Cervical cancer in Canada: changing patterns in incidence and mortality. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2001,11:24-31.

共引文献70

同被引文献160

  • 1宫颈癌及癌前病变规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(8):40-49. 被引量:243
  • 2孙小蓉,李玉兰,车东媛,晏想成,凌慧芳,凃洪章,汪键.用细胞DNA定量分析方法进行宫颈癌普查的临床研究[J].诊断病理学杂志,2005,12(1):12-16. 被引量:67
  • 3孙小蓉,汪键,Alfred Boecking.DNA倍体分析系统用于宫颈癌及上皮内瘤变的诊断及预测[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(7):435-437. 被引量:60
  • 4焦红丽,冶亚平,夏潮涌.两种染色方法在细胞核DNA含量检测中的应用及比较[J].中国体视学与图像分析,2007,12(3):180-184. 被引量:11
  • 5Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical caneer[J].Am J Clin Pathol, 2012,137(4) : 516-- 542.
  • 6Rodriguez EF, Reynolds JP, Jenkins SM, et al. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in patients with HPV positive DNA testing and correlation with disease progression by age group:an institutional experience[J].lnt J Clin Exp Pathol, 2012,5(5) : 428-- 435.
  • 7Charlton BM, Carwile JL, Michels KB, et al. A cervical abnormality risk prediction model: can we use clinical information to predict which patients with ASCUS/LSIL Pap tests will develop CIN 2/3 or AIS? [J]J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2013,17 (3) : 242-- 247.
  • 8Comar M, Iannacone MR, Casalicchio G, et al.Comparison of hybrid capture 1I , linear array, and a bead-based multiplex genotyping assay for detection of human papillomavirus in women with negative pap test results and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance[J].J Clin Mierobiol, 2012, 50(12) :4041--4046.
  • 9Roche DH, Spicer N. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting[J].N Z Med J, 2001,114 (1126) : 64--66.
  • 10Eltabbakh GH, Lipman JN, Mount SL, et al. Significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep Papanicolaou smears [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2000, 78 (2) :245--250.

引证文献15

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部