期刊文献+

慢性不可预见性温和刺激大鼠模型的听性脑干反应的改变 被引量:2

ABR Changes in a Rat Model of CUMS Induced Depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨单纯抑郁症大鼠模型的听性脑干反应(ABR)的改变。方法 16只大鼠随机分为对照组(8只):正常喂养;模型组(8只):每天随机给予多种低强度刺激,造成动物的抑郁状态,持续28天。记录各组大鼠实验前1天、第14、28天的行为学,并在造模完成后对两组大鼠行ABR检测。结果造模第14、28天,与对照组比较,模型组大鼠的旷场行为学、体重及摄食量的改变、糖水偏爱均有显著性差异(p<0.01);第28天,在声强90dBSPL条件下,与对照组比较,模型组大鼠的Ⅰ波潜伏期明显延长(P<0.05),Ⅱ波的波幅显著下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论抑郁症模型大鼠可能存在外周听觉神经至脑干通路存在神经电活动的异常。 Objective To study changes of auditory brainstem response (ABR) in a rat model of depression induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS). Methods Sixteen rats were randomly divided into a control group (n=8) and a mod- el group (n=8). The model group was randomly treated with CUMS every day to keep animals in a depressive state for 28 days. Animal behaviors were recorded using an automatic tracking system at 1 day before experiment and on Days 14 and 28. In the present study, ABRs were tested using a TDT system on Day 28 for all animals. Results Compared with the control group, the basic indices of animal behavior of the model group were markedly different from the control group on Days 14 and 28 (p〈 0.01), indicating successful modeling, although there was no statistical difference on ABR thresholds between the two groups (P〉0.05). The latencies of waves I and V in the model group were significantly longer than the control group (P〈0.05) and the amplitudes of waves II and V were markedly decreased compared to the control group (P〈0.05 and P〈0.01, respectively). Con- clusion Abnormal neuroelectric activities along the auditory pathway from the peripheral auditory organ to the brainstem may exist in rats with CUMS induced depression.
出处 《中华耳科学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期284-287,共4页 Chinese Journal of Otology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(30772397)资助
关键词 抑郁症 慢性应激 听性脑干反应 Depression CUMS Auditory brainstem response
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献92

共引文献54

同被引文献25

  • 1张明岛,陈兴时,编著.脑诱发电位学[M].第2版.上海:上海科技教育出版社,1997:97~165
  • 2JEWETr DL, WILLISTON JS. Auditory-evoked far fields aver- aged from the scalp of humans[J]. Brain, 1971, 94(4): 681-696.
  • 3HECOX K, GALAMBOS R. Brain stem auditory evoked respons- es in human infants and adults[J]. Arch Otolaryngol, 1974, 99(1): 30-33.
  • 4SUPIN AY, POPOV V, KLISHIN V. ABR frequency tuning curves in dolphins[J]. J Comp Physiol A, 1993, 173(5): 649-656.
  • 5POPOV V, SUPIN AY. Auditory brain stem responses in char- acterization of dolphin hearing[J]. J Comp Physiol A, 1990, 166 (3): 385-393.
  • 6BACKOFF PM, CASPARY DM. Age-related changes in auditory brainstem responses in Fischer 344 rats: effects of rate and in- tensity[J]. Hear Res, 1994, 73(2): 163-172.
  • 7BROWRI C J, ABBAS PJ. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig[J]. Hear Res, 1987, 25(2): 193-204.
  • 8WENSTRUP JJ. Auditory sensitivity in the fish-catching bat, Noctilio lepofinus[J]. J Comp Physiol A, 1984, 155(1): 91-101.
  • 9GORGA MP, MCGEE J, WALSH E J, et al. ABR measurements in the cat using a forward- masking paradion[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 1983, 73(1): 256-261.
  • 10PERRETTA G. Non-human primate models in neuroscience re- search[J]. Scand J Lab Anita Sci, 2009, 36(1): 77-85.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部