期刊文献+

中国五省市成人居民洗手健康干预近期效果评价 被引量:3

Evaluation for short-term effects of health intervention for handwashing behaviors of Chinese adults in five provinces
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价我国五省市城乡居民洗手健康干预的近期效果。方法采用类实验研究,多阶段分层整群抽样设计,以五省市城乡60个干预社区和60个对照社区18~60岁居民为对象进行洗手健康教育活动。通过干预前(n=6159)和干预后(n=6140)两次问卷调查比较洗手行为和知识掌握的变化情况,评价洗手健康干预的近期效果。结果干预后,干预组居民“吃东西前”、“上厕所后”、“接触钱币后”和“干完农活、下班后”每次、经常洗手的比例均高于对照组,洗手时间≥20s和不共用毛巾擦手的比例明显提高,正确洗手率由基线的49.2%上升到干预后的57.2%。农村居民正确洗手率提高程度高于城市,洗手知识知晓率提高程度低于城市。结论本次调查的洗手健康干预近期效果良好,居民在洗手时长和洗手知识的掌握上仍存在一定的问题,应加强重点地区重点人群的干预。 Objective To evaluate the short-term effects of health intervention for handwashing behaviors of Chinese adults in five provinces. Methods More than 6 000 residents aged 18-60 years from 60 intervention communities and 60 control communities were selected by multistage-clustered sampling according to the urbanization and economic level. The changes of handwashing behavior and knowledge were accessed by comparisons between the questionnaire surveys before (n=6 159) and after (n=6 140) intervention. Results After intervention, the percentages of residents in intervention communities who always or often washed hands before eating, after defecation, after touching money and after farm labor or daily work were higher than the control communities. 57,2% of the adults in intervention communities were graded to practice proper handwashing behavior,which was higher compared with that (49.2%) before intervention. The improvement of proper handwashing behavior in rural area was higher than urban area, while the knowledge level was lower. Conclusion The health intervention has positive short-term effects on handwashing behaviors and knowledge. There are still some problems in handwashing duration and knowledge among Chinese adults.
出处 《环境与健康杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期621-624,共4页 Journal of Environment and Health
基金 中国健康教育中心项目
关键词 洗手 健康干预 效果评价 成年人 Handwashing Health intervention Effect evaluation Adults
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Curtis V, Cairncross S. Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review[J]. Lancet Infect Dis,2003,3: 275-281.
  • 2Ejemot RI, Ehiri JE, Meremikwu MM, et al. Hand washing for preventing diarrhoea[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2008(1):D4265.
  • 3赵红旗,李颖林,靳新萍,王霞,余勃.陕西农村改水地区居民洗手行为调查分析[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(3):204-206. 被引量:4
  • 4朱鸿斌,曾敏,秦岭,李渊,王红虹,隆文菲.四川省“水、环境卫生和健康教育”项目县洗手行为调查研究[J].健康教育与健康促进,2011,6(4):255-258. 被引量:2
  • 5Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clean hands save lives[R/ OL].[2012-11-20] http://www.cdc.gov/handwashing.
  • 6Lopez-Quintero C, Freeman P, N eumark Y. Hand washing among school children in Bogota, Colombia[J]. Am J Public Health,2009,99:94-101.
  • 7Scott BE, Schmidt WP, Aunger R, et al. Marketing hygiene behaviours: the impact of different communication channels on reported handwashing behaviour of women in Ghana[J]. Health Educ Res,2008, 23:392-401.
  • 8Halder AK, Tronchet C, Akhter S, et al. Observed hand cleanliness and other measures of handwashing behavior in rural Bangladesh[J]. BMC Public Health,2010,10:545.
  • 9Luby SP, Halder AK. Associations among handwashing indicators, wealth, and symptoms of childhood respiratory illness in urban Bangladesh[J]. Trop Med Int Health,2008,13:835-844.
  • 10Schmidt WP, Aunger R, Coombes Y, et al. Determinants of handwashing practices in Kenya: the role of media exposure, poverty and infrastructure[J]. Trop Med Int Health,2009,14:1534-1541.

二级参考文献5

共引文献4

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部