摘要
对最高人民法院公布的79个典型行政裁量案例的实证分析表明,我国人民法院在对行政机关的事实裁量、法律适用裁量、不确定法律概念裁量、决定裁量、选择裁量和程序裁量进行审查的过程中,通过"滥用职权"标准、比例原则、维护行政相对人利益原则、程序正当原则的运用,既保障了相对人的合法权益,也充分尊重了行政机关的裁量权,妥善处理了行政权与司法权的关系,实现了法律效果、政治效果和社会效果的统一。
An empirical analysis of 79 typical cases of administrative discretion announced by the Supreme People＇ s courts showed that in the process of examining the discretion of fact.application of law. indefinite？ law concept,decision,selection and procedure acted by administrative organs, the People＇s courts of China applied the standard of abusing power, principle of proportionality, principle of protecting administrative counterpart ＇s interest and principle of due process which not only protected administrative counterpart＇s interest, but also respected the administrative discretion and properly handled the relations between administrative power and judicial authority and realized the goal of unification of legal effect,social effect and political effect.
出处
《福建行政学院学报》
2013年第3期69-77,86,共10页
Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
基金
2012年国家社科基金一般项目(12BFX044)
关键词
行政裁量
司法控制
审查对象
审查标准
Administrative discretion
Judicial control
Objection of examination
Standard of examination
