期刊文献+

基于低影响开发的合流制溢流污染控制策略研究 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在合流制区域广泛采取基于低影响开发(LID)的源头分散式雨洪控制措施可以有效地减少合流制溢流(CSO)污染,并且具有较好的经济效益和生态效益,因而受到越来越多的关注。指出传统措施和单一控制思路的局限;分析基于LID的CSO污染控制策略的产生及利用LID削减CSO污染的原理和典型案例;探讨传统控制措施与LID措施的不同特点及相互关系;最后结合我国实际,指出在我国城市推广应用LID面临的障碍并提出建议,以期为我国城市更经济、高效地控制CSO污染及在老城区广泛推广LID提供参考。
出处 《给水排水》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期47-51,共5页 Water & Wastewater Engineering
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2010ZX07320-002) 北京市城市雨水系统与水环境生态技术学术创新团队项目(PHR201106124)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1车伍,唐磊.中国城市合流制改造及溢流污染控制策略研究[J].给水排水,2012,38(3):1-5. 被引量:44
  • 2唐磊,车伍,赵杨,宫永伟.合流制溢流污染控制系统决策[J].给水排水,2012,38(7):28-34. 被引量:25
  • 3Tackett T, Mills A. Moving green stormwater infrastructure in- to seattle's CSO control program. In: Low Impact Development: Redefining Water in the City, 2010.
  • 4Soonthornnonda P, Christensen g R. Source apportionment of pollutants and flows of combined sewer wastewater. Water Re- search, 2008, 42(8-9) : 1989-1998.
  • 5Rabbaig M, Salim I, Sherrill J. City of detroit combined sewer overflow control program disposable nets with disinfection. In: 2010 MI-AWWA/MWEA Joint Conference, 2010.
  • 6Weyand M. Real-time control in combined sewer systems in Germa- ny rome ease studies. Urban Water, 2002,4(4):347-354.
  • 7Burns M J, Fletcher T D, Walsh C J, et al. Hydrologic short comings of conventional urban stormwater management and op portunities for reform. I.andscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 105(3) :230-240.
  • 8Schmitt T, Billah M, Collins J, et al. EPA's response to the current status of CSO control efforts: Development of new tools and guidance. 2010.
  • 9Gunderson J, Roseen R, Janeski T, et al. Economical CSO Management. http..//www, stormh2o, com/forms/print-7447. aspx, 2011,5.
  • 10Sustainable Stormwater Management Plan. http=//www, nycgov/ PlaNYC2030, 2008, 12.

二级参考文献22

  • 1刘燕,尹澄清,车伍,李立青.合流制溢流污水污染控制技术研究进展[J].给水排水,2009,35(S1):282-287. 被引量:18
  • 2Thomas P, Connor O,Richard F. U. S. EPA CSO capstone re- port:control system optimization. ASCE,2004.
  • 3Spicer G. Low impact development(LID)in a combined sewer o- verflow(CSO)district., evaluating the effectiveness of LID in re- ducing CSOs,Project # 117352SG,2008.
  • 4Gunderson J, Roseen R, Janeski T, et al. Economical CSO Man- agement [EB/OL]. http://www, stormh2o, eom/forms/print- 7447. aspx. 2011,5.
  • 5USEPA. Green infrastructure case studies: municipal policies for rna-oin4g stormwater with green infrastructure EPA - 841 - F - 10 - 004,2010,8.
  • 6Gebhard W, Hansj6rg B. Today's practice in stormwater man agement in Germany - Statis. NOVATECH 2007.
  • 7Matsumoto H. Combined sewer system improvement in osaka city- wet weather activated sludge process. Envirenment and Sewage Bureau, Osaka City Government, Janpan, 2006.
  • 8Uhl M, Dittmer U, Fuchs S. Soil filters for enhanced treatment of CSO - Recommendations and developments in Germany. 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage,Copenhagen/Den- mark, 2005,21-26.
  • 9Colas H, Pleau M, Lamarre J, et al. Practical perspective on real - time control. Water Qual Res, 2004,39 (4) : 466-478.
  • 10Weyand M. Real- time control in combined sewer systems in Ger- many some case studies. Urban Water,2002,4:347-354.

共引文献64

同被引文献155

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部