期刊文献+

多普勒超声应用于新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌疗效评估中的作用研究 被引量:1

Clinical evaluation of color doppler ultrasound in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨彩色多普勒超声在新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌疗效评价中的特点和应用价值。方法应用彩色多普勒超声对新辅助化疗前后乳腺癌癌肿的声像图指标改变进行观察,并以病理组织学评价为标准,评估超声评价的疗效符合率。结果超声评价符合率高达88.7%(94/106)。结论彩色多普勒超声评价准确、简捷、有效,对准确评估新辅助化疗疗效、指导临床制定个体化乳腺癌治疗方案具有重要价值。 Objective To investigate the features and value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatmentevaluation by color doppler ultrasound. Methods A total of 106 cases of breast cancer patients treated by neoadjuvantchemotherapy (ET) program were checked with color doppler ultrasound before and after breast cancer chemotherapy. Ultrasonographic indicators changes were observed to compare the evaluation of palpation and ultrasound evaluation ofthe efficacy of line rate. Results Ultrasound evaluation of compliance rate was 88.7% (94/106). Conclusion The evaluation of color doppler ultrasound is accurate, simple, effective and has significant value to guide the clinical development of individualized breast cancer treatment.
作者 刘素玲
出处 《中国现代医生》 2013年第22期65-66,69,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 新辅助化疗 乳腺癌 彩色多普勒超声 评价 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Breast cancer Color doppler ultrasound Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献81

共引文献80

同被引文献19

  • 1Jordi,Rodon,Charlotte D,et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic study of bexarotene with paclitaxel and carboplatin in pa tients with advanced non-small cell lung eaneer(NSCLC)[J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2012,69 (3) : 825-834.
  • 2Eisenhauer EA,Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J]. European Journal of Cancer, 2009, 45 (2) : 228-247.
  • 3Siegel Rebecca,Naishadham Deepa,Jemal Ahmedin. Can- cer statistics,2013[J]. CA:A Cancer Journal For Clini- cians, 2013,63 (1) : 11-30.
  • 4Fisher B, Gunduz N, Coyle J,et al. Presence of a growth- stimulating factor in serum following primary tumor re- moval in mice[J]. Cancer Research, 1989,49(8) : 1996-2001.
  • 5Fisher E, Wang J, Bryant J, et al. Pathobiology of preoper- ative chemotherapy. Findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel protocol(NSABP)B-18[J]. Can- cer, 2002,95 (6) : 681-695.
  • 6Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy:Updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27[J]. Clin Oncol, 2008.26 (5 ): 778-785.
  • 7Nabholtz J-M, Fatkson C, Campos D, et al. Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophos- phamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized,muhicenter,phase Ⅲ Trial[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology,2003,21 (6):968- 975.
  • 8Steger GG, Galid A, Gnant M, et al. Pathologic complete response with six compared with three cycles of neoadju- vant epirubicin plus docetaxel and granulocyte colony- stimulating factor in operable breast cancer:Results of ABCSG-14[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007,25 (15) : 2012-2018.
  • 9Smith IC,Heys SD,Hutcheon AW,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer:Significantly enhanced response with docetaxel[J]. Journal of Clinical Ontology, 2002,20(6) : 1456-1466.
  • 10Kaufmann M,Hortobagyi GN,Goldhirsch A,et al. Rec- ommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary)systemic treatment of opera ble breast cancer:An update[J]. Journal of Clinical On- cology, 2006,24(12) : 1940-1949.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部