期刊文献+

经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较研究 被引量:9

Comparison between transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析经脐单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效和安全性。方法对2010年1月—2012年11月10月间收治的57例慢性胆囊炎伴有息肉样病变或胆囊结石患者,分别采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(观察组,n=28)或传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(对照组,n=29),对比分析两组患者临床资料。结果观察组患者的取胆囊时间、疼痛度、疼痛时间、镇痛药应用和满意度都显著地优于对照组患者,但是观察组患者的手术时间显著地大于对照患者,两组患者的出血量、术后进食时间、术后下床活动时间、住院时间和并发症无显著地差异。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,治疗效果和安全性与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相当,并且具有术后切口疼痛轻,更好地隐蔽性和腹壁美容效果更好等优点。 Objective To analyze the curative effect and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods We analyzed retrospectively the clinical data of the transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(observation group,n = 28) or the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy(control group,n = 29) for treatment of 57 patients with chronic cholecystitis polypoid lesions or gallbladder stone in Tongling People’s Hospital from January 2010 to November 2010.Results The time for taking the gallbladder,degree of pain,pain time,pain relievers used,and satisfaction in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group.However,the operation time in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group.There were no significant differences in blood loss,postoperative eating time,bed activity time,length of hospital stay,and postoperative complications.Conclusions Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy not only shows the advantages of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy,but also has a better cosmetic results and less invasion than the conventional one.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2013年第7期1180-1182,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 单孔 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献67

共引文献310

同被引文献76

  • 1Yasumitsu Hirano,Toru Watanabe,Tsuneyuki Uchida,Shuhei Yoshida,Kanae Tawaraya,Hideaki Kato,Osamu Hosokawa.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy:Single institution experience and literature review[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(2):270-274. 被引量:24
  • 2Navarra G. PozzaE, Occhionorellis, et al.One-Wound Laparoscopic Chole- cystectomy [J].BrJ surg, 1997,84 ( 5 ) : 695.
  • 3Jphn.Romanelli, Davd.Earle.Single-port laparoscopic surgery :an overview[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009,24(8):55-67.
  • 4Cui H, Kelly JJ, Litwin DE. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approach with conventional laparoscopic instruments[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(4):1153-1159.
  • 5Tian M G, Zhang P J, Yang Y, et al. Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with modified suture retraction of the fundus: A practical approach[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2013, 9(3): 122-125.
  • 6Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, Mcgregor CG, et al. Pain, well-being, body image and cosmesis: A comparison of single-port and four- port laparoseopie eholeeystectomy[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2014, 23(4):223-229.
  • 7Wu S, Chert Y, Tian Y, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic multiple organ procedures: initial experience of 20 cases[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2013, 23(1):56-59.
  • 8Wani M, Wani H, Shahdhar M, et al. Two-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: differences in outcome[J]. Arch Int Surg, 2014, 4(2):72-77.
  • 9Lee YN, Kim W, Choi EH. Analysis of factors which reduce operation time in performance of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg, 2012, 15(3):63-67.
  • 10Wang D, Wang Y, Ji ZL. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2012, 82(5):303-310.

引证文献9

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部