摘要
目的观察臭氧雾化与甲硝唑栓治疗滴虫性阴道炎疗效差异。方法选择已确诊为滴虫性阴道炎患者100例,随机分为两组,观察组50例采用臭氧雾化治疗,对照组50例采用甲硝唑栓治疗,比较两组有效率、症状改善时间和不良反应。结果治疗结束后1周复查,观察组总有效率(98.00%,49/50)高于对照组(86.00%,43/50),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.85,P<0.05);观察组症状缓解所需时间(1.5 d)少于对照组(2.5 d),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.17,P>0.05)。结论臭氧雾化治疗滴虫性阴道炎效果良好,值得推广。
Objective To explore the curative effect of ozone nebulization and metronidazole in treating were selected trichomonas vaginitis.Methods 100 patients with trichomonas vaginitis were selected as the research subjects,and randomly divided into two groups.The observation group（50 cases） was treated with ozone nebulization and the control group（50 cases）was treated with Metronidazole Suppositories.Then,the effect,symptom relieve time and side effects were compared between the two groups.Results In one week after treatment,the total effective rate in the observation group was 98.00%（49/50）,which was higher than 86.00%（43/50） in the control group,the difference showing statistical significance（χ2=7.85,P0.05）;the symptom relieve time of the observation group was 1.5 d,which was less than 2.5 d of the control group,the difference showing statistical significance（P0.05）;the adverse reactions of the two groups had no statistical difference（χ2=2.17,P0.05）.Conclusion Useing zone nebulization for treating trichomonas vaginitis has better effect,which is worthy to be popularized.
出处
《现代医药卫生》
2013年第14期2102-2103,共2页
Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词
滴虫性阴道炎
臭氧
气雾剂
甲硝唑
栓剂
治疗结果
Trichomonas vaginitis
Ozone
Aerosols
Metronidazole
Suppositories
Treatment outcome
