期刊文献+

Comparison of UV/PDS and UV/H_2O_2 processes for the degradation of atenolol in water 被引量:4

Comparison of UV/PDS and UV/H_2O_2 processes for the degradation of atenolol in water
原文传递
导出
摘要 UV/H2O2 and UV/peroxodisulfate (PDS) processes were adopted to degrade a typical β-blocker atenolol (ATL). The degradation efficiencies under various operational parameters (oxidant dosage, pH, HCO3-, humic acid (HA), NO3- , and Cl-) were compared. Principal factor analysis was also performed with a statistical method for the two processes. It was found that increasing the specific dosage of the two peroxides ([peroxide]0/[ATL]0 ) ranging from 1:1 to 8:1 led to a faster degradation rate but also higher peroxide residual. Within the pH range 3-11, the optimum pH was 7 for the UV/PDS process and elevating pH benefitted the UV/H 2O2 process. The presence of HCO3- , HA, and Cl adversely affected ATL oxidation in both processes. The NO3- concentration 1-3 mmol/L accelerated the destruction of ATL by the UV/PDS process, but further increase of NO3- concentration retarded the degradation process, contrary to the case in the UV/H2O2 process. The rank orders of effects caused by the six operational parameters were pH ≈ specific dosage 〉 [HA]0 〉 [NO3-]0 〉 [HCO3-]0 〉 [Cl-]0 for the UV/H2O2 process and specific dosage 〉 pH 〉 [HA]0 〉 [NO3-]0 〉 [HCO3-]0 〉[Cl-]0 for the UV/PDS process. The UV/PDS process was more sensitive to changes in operational parameters than the UV/H2O2 process but more efficient in ATL removal under the same conditions. UV/H2O2 and UV/peroxodisulfate (PDS) processes were adopted to degrade a typical β-blocker atenolol (ATL). The degradation efficiencies under various operational parameters (oxidant dosage, pH, HCO3-, humic acid (HA), NO3- , and Cl-) were compared. Principal factor analysis was also performed with a statistical method for the two processes. It was found that increasing the specific dosage of the two peroxides ([peroxide]0/[ATL]0 ) ranging from 1:1 to 8:1 led to a faster degradation rate but also higher peroxide residual. Within the pH range 3-11, the optimum pH was 7 for the UV/PDS process and elevating pH benefitted the UV/H 2O2 process. The presence of HCO3- , HA, and Cl adversely affected ATL oxidation in both processes. The NO3- concentration 1-3 mmol/L accelerated the destruction of ATL by the UV/PDS process, but further increase of NO3- concentration retarded the degradation process, contrary to the case in the UV/H2O2 process. The rank orders of effects caused by the six operational parameters were pH ≈ specific dosage 〉 [HA]0 〉 [NO3-]0 〉 [HCO3-]0 〉 [Cl-]0 for the UV/H2O2 process and specific dosage 〉 pH 〉 [HA]0 〉 [NO3-]0 〉 [HCO3-]0 〉[Cl-]0 for the UV/PDS process. The UV/PDS process was more sensitive to changes in operational parameters than the UV/H2O2 process but more efficient in ATL removal under the same conditions.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2013年第8期1519-1528,共10页 环境科学学报(英文版)
关键词 sulfate radical hydroxyl radical ATENOLOL influencing factors rank order sulfate radical hydroxyl radical atenolol influencing factors rank order
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献33

  • 1Andreozzi R,Caprio V,Insola A,Marotta R,1999.Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery.Catalysis Today,53(1):51-59.
  • 2Chin A,Berube P R,2005.Removal of disinfection by-product precursors with ozone-UV advanced oxidation process.Water Research,39(10):2136-2144.
  • 3Domino M,Pepich B,Munch D,Fair P,Xie Y F,2003.EPA method 552.3:Determination of haloacetic acids and dalapon in drinking water by liquidliquid microextrcation,derivitization and gas chromatography with electron capture detection.Resource document.US EPA.http://www.epa.gov/safewater/methods/pdfs/methods/met552_3.pdf.Accessed 12 October 2009.
  • 4Ernst M,Lurot E Schrotter J C,2004.Catalytic ozonation of refractory organic model compounds in aqueous solution by aluminum oxide.Applied Catalysis B:Environmental,47(1):15-25.
  • 5Eslami A,Nasseri S,Yadollahi B,Mesdaghinia A,Vaezi F,Nabizadeh R et al.,2008.Photocatalytic degradation of methyl ten-butyl ether (MTBE) in contaminated water by ZnO nanoparticies.Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology,83(11):1447-1453.
  • 6Guo G M,Chen X D,2009.Halogenating reaction activity of aromatic organic compounds during disinfection of drinking water.Journal of Hazardous Materials,163(2-3):1207-1212.
  • 7He K,Dong Y M,Li Z,Yin L,Zhang A M,Zheng Y C,2008.Catalytic ozonation of phenol in water with natural brucite and magnesia.Journal of Hazardous Materials,159(2-3):587-592.
  • 8Hoigne J,Bader H,1981.Determination of ozone in water by the indigo method.Water Research,15(4):449-456.
  • 9Jung H Y,Choi H C,2006.Catalytic decomposition of ozone and para-chlorobenzoic acid (pCBA) in the presence of nanosized ZnO.Applied Catalysis B:Environmental,66(3-4):288-294.
  • 10Kallen B A J,Robert E,2000.Drinking water chlorination and delivery outcome-a registry-based study in Sweden.Reproductive Toxicology,14(4):303-309.

共引文献6

同被引文献34

  • 1高培国,强辉,凌鸣.葛根素对过氧化氢诱导的血管内皮细胞损伤的保护作用[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2012,33(2):245-248. 被引量:45
  • 2郭洪光,高乃云,张永丽,李长军,区永杰.热激活过硫酸盐降解水中典型氟喹诺酮抗生素分析[J].四川大学学报(工程科学版),2015,47(2):191-197. 被引量:21
  • 3Liu Z,Kanjo Y,Mizutani S.Removal mechanisms for endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in waste water treatment - physical means,biodegradation,and chemical advanced oxidation:a review [J].Science of the Total Environment,2009,407(2):731-748.
  • 4Fowler P A,Bellingham M,Sinclair K D,et al.Impact of endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) on female reproductive health [J].Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology,2012,355(2):231-239.
  • 5Andersen H,Siegrist H,Halling-Srensen B,et al.Fate of estrogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2003,37(18):4021-4026.
  • 6Ahmad M,Teel A L,Watts R J.Mechanism of persulfate activation by phenols[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47(11):5864-5871.
  • 7Yu C,Wu C,Ho T,et al.Decolorization of C.I.reactive black 5 in UV/TiO2,UV/oxidant and UV/TiO2/oxidant systems:a comparative study[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2010,158(3):578-583.
  • 8Kwon M,Kim S,Yoon Y,et al.Comparative evaluation of ibuprofen removal by UV/H2O2 and UV/S2O2- 8 processes for wastewater treatment[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,269(1):379-390.
  • 9Liang C,Wang Z,Bruell C J.Influence of pH on persulfate oxidation of TCE at ambient temperatures [J].Chemosphere,2007,66(1):106-113.
  • 10Wicktor F,Donati A,Herrmann H,et al.Laser based spectroscopic and kinetic investigations of reactions of the Cl atom with oxygenated hydrocarbons in aqueous solution[J].Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics,2003,5(12):2562-2572.

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部