期刊文献+

血清肿瘤标记物联合检测诊断胃癌的临床价值 被引量:6

Clinical value of combined serum tumor markers detection in gastric cancer diagnosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清肿瘤标记物联合检测诊断胃癌的临床价值。方法选取65例经临床诊断为胃癌患者分入胃癌组,另选60例良性胃病患者分入良性胃病组,分别检测两组患者的癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原50(CA50)及糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)血清肿瘤标记物水平,并对其单独及联合阳性检测率、灵敏度及特异度进行分析。结果两组患者的血清肿瘤标记物差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);胃癌组CEA、CA125、CA50及CA19-9阳性检测率分别为52.3%、32.3%、53.9%和38.5%,良性胃病组为18.3%、15.0%、11.7%和16.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);灵敏度依次为50.8%、46.2%、49.2%和61.5%,显著低于联合检测灵敏度84.6%(P<0.05);特异度依次为95.4%、92.3%、86.2%和95.4%,与联合检测特异度87.7%相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论血清肿瘤标记物联合检测诊断胃癌具有重要的临床价值,有利于提高胃癌临床诊断的灵敏度。 Objective To explore clinical value of combined detection of serum tumor markers in gastric cancer diagnosis.Methods 65 patients clinically diagnosed as gastric cancer were selected as gastric cancer group,and 60 patients suffered from benign gastric disease as benign gastric disease group.The levels of four serum tumor markers of serum CEA,CA125,of CA50 and of CA19-9 were determined,and respcetive and combined detection positive rates,sensitivities and specificities were compared.Results There was a significant difference among the levesl of four serum tumor markers between the two groups(P0.05).The positive detection rates of CEA,CA125,of CA50 and CA19-9 were 52.3%,32.3 %,53.9% and 38.5% in the gastric cancer group,and 18.3%,15.0%,11.7% and 16.7% in the benign gastric disease group,as were statistically differenet(P0.05).Accordingly,sensitivities were 50.8%,46.2%,49.2% and 61.5%,significantly lower than that of combined detection(P0.05).specificities in turn were 95.4%、92.3%、86.2% and 95.4%,which were not statistically different with 87.7% of combined detection(P0.05).Conclusions Combined detection of serum tumor markers had an important clinical value and helped improving the sensitivities in the clinical diagnosis of gastric cancer.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2013年第7期702-704,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 癌胚抗原 糖类抗原125 糖类抗原50 糖类抗原19-9 胃肿瘤 CEA CA125 CA50 CA19-9 Gastric neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献39

  • 1余剑英,李菁.血清CA242、CA125、CA199含量对消化系肿瘤的诊断价值[J].实用预防医学,2005,12(4):787-788. 被引量:22
  • 2魏晓明.胃癌血清肿瘤标志物的检测及临床意义[J].医学检验与临床,2006,18(6). 被引量:2
  • 3王轶.胃癌病程分期与血清CA724、CA242及CEA水平关系探讨[J].放射免疫学杂志,2006,19(3):225-226. 被引量:45
  • 4Yamamoto M,Baba H,Toh Y,et al.Peritoneal lavage CEA/CA125 is a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients[J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2007,133(7):471.
  • 5Duraker N,Celik A N.The prognostic significance ofpreoperative serum CA199 in patients with respectable gastric carcinoma:comparison with CEA[J].J Surg Oncol,2001,76(4):266.
  • 6Nakagoe T,Sawai T,Tsuji T,et al.Predictive factors for preoperative serum levels of sialy Lewis(x),sialyl Lewis(a) and sialyl Tn antigens in gastric cancer patients[J].Anticancer Res,2002,22(1A):451.
  • 7Marrelli D,Pinto E,De Stefano A,et al.Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers in a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer[J].J Surg Oncol,2001,78(4):253.
  • 8Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics. 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 1999,49:33-64.
  • 9Sakakura C, Hagiwara A, Nakanishi M, et al. Differential gene expression profiles of gastric cancer cells established from primary tumour and malig- nant ascites. Br J Cancer,2002,87 : 1153.
  • 10Gold P, Freedam SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinoma by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med, 1965,121:439-462.

共引文献126

同被引文献65

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部