期刊文献+

用于肾移植的几种免疫抑制方案的对比研究 被引量:6

Comparative study of current immunosuppression regimens for renal transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较肾移植后几种常用免疫抑制治疗方案的疗效与副作用。方法 根据所使用的免疫抑制治疗方案将 87例肾移植患者分为 4组 ,A组的免疫抑制治疗方案为他克莫司 (FK5 0 6 )、霉酚酸酯 (MMF)和泼尼松 (Pred) ;B组为环孢素A(CsA)、MMF和Pred ;C组为CsA、硫唑嘌呤 (Aza)和Pred ;D组为CsA和Pred。观察术后移植肾功能的恢复情况、排斥反应发生率、并发症及免疫抑制剂用量的变化。结果 A、B、C、D组移植肾 1年存活率分别为 10 0 %、96 .9%、85 .7%和 10 0 % ,急性排斥反应发生率分别为 0 %、15 .2 %、5 2 .4%和 5 2 .6 % ;A、B组的感染发生率高于C、D组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而C、D组术后初期一过性肝功能异常的发生率高于A、B组 ;移植后各组CsA用量逐渐减少 ,激素的用量也逐渐减少 ,但A组激素的调整幅度明显大于B、C、D组。结论 肾移植术后免疫稳态的建立是一个动态过程 ,鉴于个体差异性和免疫系统复杂性 ,不可能采用统一免疫抑制模式 ,应遵循选择性、协调性和特异性的用药原则。 Objectives To compare the therapeutic effects and side effects of four immunosuppression regimens for renal transplantation. Methods According to different drug combinations, 87 allograft recipients were divided into four groups: group A receiving FK506, MMF and Pred; group B receiving CsA, MMF and Pred; group C receiving CsA, Aza and Pred; group D receiving CsA and Pred. The recovery of renal function, survival rate, rejection episodes, complications and the changes in doses of immunosuppressive agents were observed. Results One-year survival rate in the groups A, B, C and D was 100*!%, 96.9 *!%, 85.7 *!% and 100*!% respectively. Rejection episodes in each group were 0 (group A), 5 (group B), 11 (group C) and 10 (group D). The infection rate in groups A and B was higher than in the groups C and D ( P < 0.05 ). The rate of transient liver function abnormality in groups C and D was higher than in groups A and B at the early stage after operation. CsA dosage in each group was gradually decreased and so did the dosage of hormone after operation. Conclusions Varied immunosuppression regimens should be selected due to differences in individuals and complexity of immune system.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 2000年第5期285-287,共3页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
关键词 肾移植 免疫抑制剂 对比研究 他克莫司 霉酚酸酯 Kidney transplantation Immunosuppressive agents Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Pirsch JD,Miller J,Deierhoi MH,et al.A comparison of tacrolimus(FK506 ) and cycloporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation[].Transplantation.1997
  • 2TheMycophenolatemofetilacuterenalrejectionstudygroup.Mycophenolatemofetilfortreatmentofafirstacuterenalallograftrejection[].Transplantation.1998

同被引文献58

  • 1张信英,于钟毓,毕郑钢,张震宇,尚剑,邵明,张军,曹阳,杨成林,杜劲松.同种异体肢体(手)移植[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2004,38(5):461-464. 被引量:1
  • 2姜丽萍,胡善联,郑少玲,李澄棣.不同免疫抑制方案对肾移植术后急性排斥反应的成本-效果分析[J].温州医学院学报,2004,34(6):417-419. 被引量:11
  • 3章咏裳,鲁波,周惜才,李家贵,周四维,叶章群,庄乾元,曾进,杨为民,赵建军.FK506肾毒性的机理探讨及其防治研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1996,17(6):345-348. 被引量:2
  • 4李立明.临床流行病学[M].人民卫生出版社,2002.272-282.
  • 5Wolfe RA,Ashby VB,Milford EL,et al.Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis,patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation,and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.N Engl J Med,1999,341:1725.
  • 6Timothy H.Mathew.A Blinded,Long-team,Randomized Multicenter Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Cadaveric Renal transplantation.Transplantation,1998,65:1450-1454.
  • 7Hariharan S,Johnson CP,Bresnahan BA,et al.Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States,1988 to 1996.N Engl J med,2000,342:1837-1838.
  • 8Wuthrich RP,Weinreich T,et al.Reduced kidney transplant rejection rate and pharmacoeconomic advantage of mycophenolate mofetil.Nephrol-Dial-Transplant,1999,14:394-399.
  • 9Mathew TH.A blinded,long-team,randomized multicenter study of mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation:results of three years.Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study[J]. Transplantation,1998,65(11):1450-1454.
  • 10Suleymanlar G, Tuncer M, Sarikaya M. The cost effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil in the first year after living related renal transplantation[J].Transplant Proc, 2001,33(5): 2780-2781.

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部