期刊文献+

肾移植患者术后早期应用霉酚酸酯的临床观察 被引量:4

Clinical observation on the early application of Cellcept following cadaveric renal transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察肾移植术后早期不同剂量霉酚酸酯 (MMF)与环孢素A(CsA)和泼尼松(Pred)联用预防急性排斥反应的效果及安全性。方法 将 6 4例肾移植患者分为 3组 ,分别给予MMF 2 .0 g/d(A组 )、1.5 g/d(B组 )及Aza 5 0~ 10 0mg/d(C组 ) ,每组均联用CsA及Pred(剂量相同 )。观察肾移植术后 6个月内急性排斥反应的发生率、移植肾功能及药物的副作用。结果 A、B、C组急性排斥反应的发生率分别为 11.1%、0及 2 7.5 % ;A、B组消化道的副作用多见 ,尤以A组为高 ,其它副作用 3个组的差异无显著性 ;移植肾功能延迟恢复的发生率 ,A、B两组明显高于C组。结论 不同诱导剂量的MMF与CsA和Pred短期联用 ,可有效预防术后早期急性排斥反应的发生 ;MMF除胃肠道的副作用较多外 ,其它副作用未见增多。 Objectives To investigate the efficiency and safety of combined use of different doses of Cellcept (MMF) with CsA and Pred at the early stage after renal transplantation for preventing and treating the acute renal allograft rejection. Methods Sixty-four cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly divided into 3 groups, receiving MMF 2.0 *!g/d, CsA and Pred (group A), MMF 1.5 *!g/d, CsA and Pred (group B) and Aza 50 to 100*!mg/d, CsA and Pred (group C) respectively. The incidence of the acute renal allograft rejection, the function of the renal graft and the different adverse effects in the recipients at the first 6 months after renal transplantation were observed. Results The incidence of the acute rejection was 11.11 *!%,0, 27.5 *!% in the groups A, B and C respectively. The frequency of diarrhea was the highest in the group A, and other side events were similar among the three groups. Conclusions Combined use of different doses of MMF with CsA and Pred could effectively prevent the occurrence of acute rejection at the early stage after transplantation. Except for the side events of gastrointestine, other MMF-induced side effects was not increased.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 2000年第5期294-295,共2页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
关键词 肾移植 免疫抑制剂 移植物排斥 霉酚酸酯 Kidney transplantation Immunosuppressive agents Graft rejection Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

同被引文献38

  • 1范昱,谢桐.肾移植后慢性排斥的治疗[J].中华器官移植杂志,1993,14(1):35-37. 被引量:9
  • 2卢一平,沈宏,杨宇如,唐科仕,王莉.钙通道阻滞剂在肾移植术后早期应用的临床研究[J].华西医学,1996,11(4):483-486. 被引量:4
  • 3The U.S. Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection of primary cadaveric kidney transplants: status of the MYC 1866 study at 1 year[J]. Transplant Proc, 1997; 29(1-2): 348-349.
  • 4The Tricontinental Mycophnolate Mofetil Rneal Transplantation Study Group. A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 1996; 61(7): 1029-1037.
  • 5European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Mycophenolate in renal transplantation: 3-year results from the placebo-controlled trial[J]. Transplantation, 1999; 68(3): 391-396.
  • 6Solinger HW. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients[J]. Transplantation, 1995; 60(3): 225-232.
  • 7European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroid for prevention of acute rejection[J]. Lancet, 1995; 345(8 961): 1321-1325.
  • 8Giuseppe R, Mariadomenica L, Eliana G, Maria G, Borislav DD, Bogdan EI, Giulia G, Donato D, Maurizio S, Silvio S, Umberto V, Giuseppe S, Georges M, Stefano F, Paolo R, Vito S, Jean-Louis B, Norberto P, Piero R. Mycophenolate mofetil versus AZAthioprine for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation (MYSS): a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2004; 364(7): 503-512.
  • 9Sami S, Jos′e M, Manuel A, Jacques S, Jean-paul S, Bruno V, Short-term combination of mcophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine as a therapeutic option for renal transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2002; 74(4): 511-517.
  • 10Miladipour AH, Ghods AJ, Nejadgashti H. Effect of mcophenolate mofetil on the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection[J]. Transplantation Proceedings, 2002; 34: 2089-2090.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部