参与方地位非对称条件下PPP项目风险分配的博弈模型被引量：128

Game model for PPP project's risk allocation under the asymmetry condition of participant's position

导出

摘要相对于现有的关于PPP项目风险分配的研究都是基于参与方地位对称的情形,该文利用讨价还价博弈理论,结合项目参与方地位非对称的现实情况,分别构建了完全信息条件下和不完全信息条件下PPP项目风险分配的讨价还价博弈模型,并分别得出了对应的子博弈精炼纳什均衡.该文的研究成果不仅在理论上有益地补充了PPP项目风险分配研究的不足,而且对保障我国准公共项目的建设也具有非常重要的现实意义. Comparing to the current research on PPP project＇s risk allocation based on the symmetry of participants＇ status, this paper combines the realistic asymmetry of participants＇ status in the bargaining game theory to construct a bargaining game model for PPP project＇s risk allocation under the conditions of complete and incomplete information respectively. Through the analysis of the model, the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium is found as the corresponding solution. The findings of this paper not only supplement the research of the risk allocation of PPP project in the aspect of theory but also have great realistic significance in ensuring the construction of quasi-public project.

作者李林刘志华章昆昌

机构地区湖南大学工商管理学院

出处《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期1940-1948,共9页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice

基金国家软科学研究计划项目(2012GXS2D020) 教育部规划基金(10YJA630079) 湖南省哲学社会科学成果评审委员会课题(1011068B)

关键词 PPP项目风险分配讨价还价博弈地位非对称 PPP project risk allocation bargaining game asymmetry of status

分类号 F224.32 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Latham S M. Constructing the team: Joint review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the United Kingdom construction industry[M]. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1994.
2Abednego M P, Ogunlana S O. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnership in Indonesia[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, 24(7): 622-634.
3E1-Sayegh S M. Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26(4): 431 -638.
4Jin X H, Zhang G M. Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(5): 591-603.
5Bing L, Akintoye A, Edwards P J, et al. The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2005, 23(1): 25-35.
6Roumboutsos A, Anagnostopoulos K P. Public-private partnership projects in Greece: risk ranking and preferred risk allocation[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2008, 26(7): 751- 763.
7Jin X H, Doloi H. Interpreting risk allocation mechanism in public-private partnership projects: An empirical study in a transaction cost economics perspective[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2008, 26(7): 707 -721.
8Yeo K T, Tiong R L K. Positive management of differences for risk reduction in BOT projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2000, 18(4): 257 -265.
9Ahwireng-Obeng F, Mokgohlwa J P. Entrepreneurial risk allocation in public-private infrastructure provision in South Africa[J]. South African Journal of Business Management, 2002, 33(4): 29-39.
10杜亚灵,尹贻林,严玲.公共项目绩效改善研究：风险分配途径[J].科技管理研究,2008,28(5):274-276. 被引量：12