期刊文献+

不同保水性鸡肉的品质比较和相关性研究 被引量:21

Comparison of Chicken Meat Quality with Different Water-holding Capacity and Correlation Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用聚类分析方法将随机取样的18只白羽肉鸡的胸肉聚为低汁液损失率组(汁液损失率<2%)和高汁液损失率组(汁液损失率≥2%),比较两组鸡肉的蛋白质、肌纤维结构等特点,研究其造成保水性差的原因。结果表明:与低汁液损失率组相比,高汁液损失率组的样品宰后pH值较低,亮度值较高,肌节变短,肌纤维空隙面积变大,总蛋白质溶解性较低。差示扫描量热法(DSC)测定结果显示高汁液损失率组肌球蛋白头部变性温度(T1)和肌球蛋白尾部及肌浆蛋白变性温度(T2)显著低于低汁液损失率组,说明高汁液损失率组的肌球蛋白更易变性。通过相关性分析将鸡肉保水性差的原因归结于低pH值、蛋白质变性和肌纤维结构的变化。 Chicken breasts from eighteen white broilers were divided into lower drip loss group(drip loss 2%) and higher drip loss group(drip loss ≥ 2%) through cluster analysis.The protein and structure of muscle fibers were compared,and correlation analysis was conducted.The results showed that the higher drip loss group had lower pH,higher L* value,shorter sarcomere and larger ratio of extra cellular space and poorer total protein solubility when compared with the lower drip loss group.The denaturing temperature(T1) of the head of myosin protein and that(T2) of the tail of myosin protein and sarcoplasmic protein in the lower drip loss group were lower that in the higher drip loss group as examined by differential scanning calorimetry(DSC).These results indicated that more pronounced denaturation of myosin protein in meat from high drip loss group happened than that from that low drip loss group.The reasons for unacceptable water-holding capacity were attributed to the lower pH and the denaturation of protein as well as the change of muscle fibers.
出处 《食品科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第13期45-49,共5页 Food Science
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD70B02) 国家现代农业(肉鸡)产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-42)
关键词 保水性 蛋白溶解性 差示扫描量热法 肌纤维结构 water-holding capacity protein solubility DSC muscle fiber structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1ZHANG L,BARBUT S.Rheological characteristics of fresh andfrozen PSE,normal and DFD chicken breast meat[J].British PoultryScience,2005,46(6):687-693.
  • 2廖洪波,马海霞,尚勇彪,李洪军.大力发展鸡肉制品工业[J].肉类工业,2003(12):44-47. 被引量:20
  • 3WOELFEL R L,OWENS C M,HIRSCHILER E M,et al.Thecharacterization and incidence of pale,soft and exudative broilermeat in a commercial processing plant[J].Poultry Science,2002,81:579-584.
  • 4MONIN G,LABORDE D.Water holding capacity of pig muscleprotein:interaction between the myofibrillar protein and sarcoplasmiccompounds[J].Science Aliments,1985,5:341-345.
  • 5PAREDDI M E,TOMAS M C,CRUPKIN M,et al.Thermaldenaturation of muscle protein from male and female Squid(Illexargentinus)at different sexual maturation,stages.A differentialscanning calorimetric study[J].Journal of Agriculture and Food andChemistry,1996,44:3812-3816.
  • 6MURPHT R Y,MARKE B H,MARCY J K.Apparent specific heatof chicken breast patties and their constituent protein by differentialscanning calorimetry [J].Journal of Food Science,1998,63:88-91.
  • 7杜桌民.实用组织学技术[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1982:102-114.
  • 8HONIKEL K 0.Reference methods for the assessment of physicalcharacteristics of meat[J].Meat Science,199B,49:447-457.
  • 9JOO S T,KAUFFMAN R G,KIM B C,et al.The relationship ofsarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to color and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle[J].Meat Science,1999,52:291-297.
  • 10CROSS H R,WEST R L,DUTSON T R.Comparison of methods formeasuring sarcomere length on beef semitendinosus muscle[J].MeatScience,1981,5:261-266.

共引文献19

同被引文献281

引证文献21

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部