摘要
目的探讨可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶持续负压吸引治疗自发性气胸持续漏气的疗效观察及护理。方法将2008年3月-2012年10月收治的自发性气胸行胸腔闭式引流术后接传统闭式引流瓶,引流达3 d胸腔仍有漏气患者55例分为A组(治疗组)、B组(对比组)。A组30例更换为可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶、B组25例继续使用传统闭式引流瓶。结果 A组患者平均带管时间缩短,管腔堵塞、引流液逆流、低蛋白血症等并发症发生比B组减少。结论可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶持续胸腔负压吸引治疗自发性气胸持续漏气患者治疗效果优于传统闭式引流好,患者带管时间及平均住院时间缩短,住院费用降低,安全性高,并发症少。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and nursing care of thoracic drainage bottle regulator for spontaneous pneumothorax.Methods From March 2008 to October 2012 closed thoracic drainage was performed for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax before traditional closed drainage bottle treatment.Fifty-five patients with pleural air leaks after three-day drainage were randomly divided into group A（treatment group） and group B（control group）.Thirty patients in group A accepted thoracic drainage bottle regulator,while 25 patients in group B continued to use the traditional closed drainage bottle.Results Average pipe-wearing time was shorter in group A patients,and lumen clogging drainage upstream,hypoalbuminemia and other complications in group B were significantly higher than those in group A.Conclusions In the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax,thoracic drainage bottle regulator is superior to the traditional closed drainage bottle.Pipe-wearing time and hospital stay are shorter,and complication incidence and cost are lower with a great safety.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
2013年第7期1014-1016,共3页
West China Medical Journal
关键词
可调压胸腔闭式引流瓶
持续负压吸引
治疗
自发性气胸
Thoracic drainage bottle regulator
Continuous suction
Treatment
Spontaneous pneumothorax
