辱虐管理与团队绩效:团队沟通与集体效能的中介效应被引量：16

Abusive Supervision and Team Performance: Mediating Effects of Team Communication and Efficacy

导出

摘要辱虐管理是近年来备受国内外学术界关注的一种负向领导行为。已有的辱虐管理研究都集中在个体层面,侧重于关注辱虐管理对于员工心理健康、工作态度和工作行为的影响等,至今未有研究关注辱虐管理对于团队层面结果变量的影响。以我国10家制造型企业中的95个团队为实证研究对象,本文探讨了辱虐管理对团队绩效的影响,并以Cohen和Bailey提出的团队效能启示模型(Heuristic Model of Team Effectiveness)为基础,进一步分析了团队沟通及团队集体效能在其中所起的中介作用。层级回归分析结果表明,辱虐管理对团队绩效具有显著的负向影响,团队沟通和团队集体效能在辱虐管理与团队绩效之间的关系中起着完全中介的作用。 Abusive supervision is increasingly receiving research attentions in Western academy of management. Existing studies of abusive supervision are all conducted at the individual level to investigate its influence on employees＇ psychological, attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Up to now there have been no studies that focus on abusive supervision＇s effects on team level outcomes. Based upon data collected from 95 teams of ten manufacturing companies, the current study investigates the abusive supervision-team performance linkage. Enlightened by the heuristic model of team effectiveness, we further examine the mediating roles played by team communication and efficacy. Hierarchical regression modeling results show that abusive supervision has a negative effect on team performance, which can be fully mediated by team communication and efficacy.

作者吴隆增刘军梁淑美吴维库

机构地区上海财经大学国际工商管理学院中国人民大学商学院香港浸会大学工商管理学院清华大学经济管理学院

出处《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期151-159,共9页 Management Review

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71202001 70972025) 上海市浦江人才计划项目(13PJC053) 上海市教育委员会和上海市教育发展基金会"晨光计划"(12CG44)

关键词辱虐管理团队沟通团队集体效能团队绩效 abusive supervision, team communication, team efficacy, team performance

分类号 C936 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献44

1Kozlowski S. W. J., Bell B. S. Work Groups and Teams in Organizations[M]//ln Borman W. C., Ilgen D. R., Klimoski R. I. (Ed.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York: Wiley, 2003.
2Hackman J. R. Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performance[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
3Bass B. M. Leadership and Performance beyond Expectation[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
4Conger J. A., Kanungo R. N. The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1988,13(3):471-483.
5Ashforth B. Petty Tyranny in Organizations: A Preliminary Examination of Antecedents and Consequences[J]. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 1997,14(2):126-140.
6Tepper B. J. Consequences of Abusive Supervision[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000,43(2):178-190.
7Yukl G. Leadership in Organizations[M]. Upper Saddle River, N J: Prentice Hall, 2002.
8I-Ioobler J., Brass D. Abusive Supervision and Family Undermining as Displaced Aggression[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006,91(5):1125-1133.
9Valle M. A Preliminary Model of Abusive Behavior in Organizations[J]. Southern Business Review, 2005,30(2):27-35.
10Zellars K. L., Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K. Abusive Supervision and Subordinates' Organizational Citizenship Behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87(6):1068-1076.