摘要
康德式的"逻辑的"传统对认知科学的发展起到了重要作用。从认知科学的角度看,康德尝试通过弥合心智与环境之间的关系来为知识奠基,其认识论体系本质上是一种"先验的观念论"。在内在主义的意义上,康德哲学与笛卡尔哲学存在某种一致性,但是在认知科学中,研究者更其重视笛卡尔。正是这个原因,在反笛卡尔主义的过程中,研究者未能注意回避掉康德式认知哲学所存在的困境。具身认知研究方案下的生成进路或多或少会陷入康德式的主体建构的内在主义困境,即生物中心论;延展认知则通过注重人类认知与环境之间的相互作用关系避开了这一困境。
The Kantian ＂logical＂ tradition plays an important role in the development of cognitive science. Kant advances a phi- losophy of transcendental subject. Although,in some sense of internalism, Kant and Descartes have some coherence, modern re- searchers in cognitive science do not pay much attention to avoiding the dilemma of Kant as in the process of anti-Cartesian. The enactive approach under the umbrella of the embodied cognition may fall into the dilemma of internalism, called biocen- trism. However,extended cognition is by focusing on the interaction relationship between human cognition and the environment to avoid this dilemma.
出处
《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第3期9-16,共8页
Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
贵州大学科研基金项目(2013)"延展认知的哲学基础"
关键词
康德
认知哲学
主体哲学
具身认知
延展认知
Kant
cognitive philosophy
philosophy of suhj ectivity
embodied cognition
extended cognition
