期刊文献+

基于全身化疗基础上胸部三维放疗对Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌预后影响 被引量:4

The Impact of Thoracic Radiotherapy in Combination with Chemotherapy on the Prognosis in Patients with Stage Ⅳ Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基于全身化疗的基础上胸部原发病灶三维放疗在Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌综合治疗中的作用.方法:2003年1月至2010年7月93例Ⅳ期NSCLC患者接受至少4周期化疗并同期胸部原发病灶三维放疗≥40Gy,对疗效及预后因素进行分析,Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并行Logrank检验,Cox回归模型行多因素预后分析.结果:末次随访日期2013年3月,中位随访14.0个月(4.0个月~80.0个月);截止末次随访有5例患者存活,生存时间34.0个月~ 80.0个月,中位生存时间64.0个月.全组中位生存期为14.0个月(95% CI,11.44-16.60),1年、2年、3年生存率分别为54.8%、20.4%和12.9%.61例知道确切死亡原因,48例患者死于远处转移,7例死亡时局部复发伴有远处转移,仅2例死亡时单纯局部复发.胸部原发灶放疗处方剂量≥63 Gy和<63Gy的中位生存期分别为15.0个月(95% CI,12.86~17.14)和8.0个月(95% CI,5.89-10.11)(x2=10.416,P=0.001);单器官转移患者生存期比多器官转移患者长,MST为15.0个月(95% CI,12.25-17.75)比10.0个月(95% CI,6.04-13.96) (x2=9.436,P =0.002).亚组分析,单器官转移患者DTpTv≥63 Gy仍是影响生存的因素(x2=4.733,P=0.030);多器官转移患者DTpTv≥63Gy有延长总生存的趋势(x2=3.488,P=0.062).多因素分析显示:胸部原发肿瘤(DTpTv)≥63Gy和单器官转移是影响总生存期的独立预后因素.结论:全身系统化疗的基础上,胸部原发病灶积极的放射治疗(≥63Gy)能使患者生存获益,单器官转移患者从该治疗模式中获益较大,多器官转移患者也有生存获益的趋势,积极的放射治疗可能在改善生存方面具有重要作用. Objective: To investigate the therapettic effect of thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy in combination with sys- temic chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We analyzed the therapeutic efficacies and prognostic factors for 93 cases of patients with stage IV NSCLC who received at least four cycles of chemotherapy in combination with concurrent thoracic three-dimensional radiotherapy of t〉40 Gy on primary tumors from January 2003 to July 2010. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate the OS. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves. Multivariate cox regression ana- lyses were used to test independent significant prognostic factors for OS. Results: The last follow-up date was March 2013, the median survival time (MST) was 14. 0 months, and the 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates was 54. 8%, 20. 4% , and 12.9% , respectively. At the last follow up, 5 patients were still alive, MST was 64. 0 months ( range, 34 - 80). The MST of the patients received thoracic radiation dose of I〉63 Gy and 〈 63 Gy for the primary tumor were 15.0 and 8.0 months, respectively ( X2 = 10. 416, P =0. 001 ). The MST of patients with metastasis to a single organ were longer than that of patients with metastasis to multiple organs ( 15.0 months vs. 10.0 months) (X2 = 9.436, P = 0. 002). In a sub- group analysis of the patients with metastasis to a single organ, thoracic radiation dose 〉/63 Gy remained a prognostic factor for survival ( X2 = 4. 733, P = 0. 030) ; in the patients with metastases in multiple organs, radiation dose 1〉63 Gy had a trend to improve overall survival (~2 = 3. 488, P =0. 062). A multivariate a- nalysis showed that radiation dose /〉63 Gy on the primary tumor and metastasis to a single organ were associated with better overall sur- vival time. Conclusion: In combination with systemic chemotherapy, radiation dose I〉63 Gy on the primary tumor and metastasis to a single organ are significant factors for better overall survival. Aggressive radiotherapy may improve survival of a subset of such patients with stage IV NSCLC.
出处 《肿瘤预防与治疗》 2013年第4期196-200,共5页 Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
基金 贵州省科技公关项目[SY(2010)3078] 贵州省科学技术自然基金项目[J(2010)2186]
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 Ⅳ期 放射疗法 三维 预后 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV Radiotherapy Three-dimensional Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Siegel R,Naishadham D,Jemal A.Cancer statistics,2012[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2012,62(1):10-29.
  • 2Azzoli CG,Temin S,Aliff T,et al.2011 Focused Update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage Ⅳ Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2011,29(28):3825-3831.
  • 3Sundstrom S,Bremnes R,Aasebo U,et al.Hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy (17 Gy per two fractions) in advanced nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma is comparable to standard fractionation for symptom control and survival:a national phase Ⅲ trial[J].J Clin Oncol,2004,22 (5):801-810.
  • 4Kramer GW,Wanders SL,Noordijk EM,et al.Results of the Dutch National study of the palliative effect of irradiation using two different treatment schemes for non-small-cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23(13):2962-2970.
  • 5Lopez Guerra JL,Gomez D,Zhuang Y,et al.Prognostic impact of radiation therapy to the primary tumor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and oligometastasis at diagnosis[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,84(1):e 61-e 67.
  • 6Arrieta O,Villarreal-Garza C,Zamora J,et al.Long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis treated with whole-brain radiotherapy and thoracic chemoradiation[J].Radiat Oncol,2011,6 (1):166.
  • 7Rodrigues G,Videtic GMM,Sur R,et al.Palliative thoracic radiotherapy in lung cancer:an american society for radiation oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline[J].Practical Radiation Oncology,2011,1 (2):60-71.
  • 8Wagner H,Jr.Just enough palliation:radiation dose and outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(24):3920-3922.
  • 9苏胜发,卢冰,张波,胡银祥,欧阳伟炜,栗蕙芹,王刚,龙金华.Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌化疗同期胸部三维放疗的前瞻性临床研究(一)——疗效与不良反应[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20(6):467-472. 被引量:16
  • 10Schiller JH,Harrington D,Belani CP,et al.Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346(2):92-98.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years :analysis of the surveillance,epidemiologic,and end results database.J Clin ,2006,24:4539-4544.
  • 2Ramalingam S, Belani CP. State-of-the-art chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin 0ncol,2004,31:68- 74.
  • 3Morgensztem D, Waqar S, Subramanian J, et al. Improving survival for stage 1V non-small cell lung cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results survey from 1990 to 2005. J Clin Onco1,2009,4 : 1524-1529.
  • 4Kramer GW, Wanders SL, Noordijk EM, et al. Results of the Dutch national study of the palliative effect of irradiation using two different treatment schemes for non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Onco1,2005 ,23 :2962-2970.
  • 5Fang LC, Komaki R, Allen P, et al. Comparison for patients with medically inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer treated with two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2006,66 : 108-116.
  • 6Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med ,2002,346:92-98.
  • 7Kelly K, Crowley J, Bunn PA, et al. Randomized phase HI trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a southwest oncology group trial. J Clin Oncol,2001,19: 3210- 3218.
  • 8Postmus PE, Brambilla E, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project : proposals for revision of the M descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac 0ncol,2007,2:686-593.
  • 9Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project:proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors. J Thorac Oncol, 2007, 2 : 706- 714.
  • 10Scagliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M, et al. Phase m randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2002,20: 4285-4291.

共引文献23

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部