期刊文献+

昆明金殿森林公园2个园区景观生态效益分析 被引量:4

Analyses on the Landscape and Ecological Benefits of Two Sections inside Kunming Jindian Forest Park
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于研究区域的AutoCAD图相关信息结合实地调查,运用模糊层次分析法和CITYgreen5.0软件,依据生物多样性、生态效益、景观观赏性和休闲娱乐功能4类指标对昆明市金殿森林公园中的文化景廊和水景园进行园林景观效益和部分生态效益的综合分析和评定。结果显示,生物多样性指标文化景廊8.03分<水景园8.67分;生态效益指标文化景廊12.61分<水景园21.45分;景观观赏性指标文化景廊33.33分>水景园32.10分;休闲娱乐指标文化景廊23.60分<水景园23.77分。水景园整体得分85.98分,略高于文化景廊77.56分。 Based on AutoCAD graphic information and field survey, the landscape and ecological benefits of the "Culture Scenic Corridor (CS)" and "Water Landscape (WL)" Sections inside Kunming Jindian Forest Park were comparatively studied by means of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and CITYgreenS. 0 model. Evaluation indices included biodiversity, ecological benefit, landscape ornamental feature, and recreational and enter tainment function. The orders of relative evaluation indices were as follows: biodiversity index, CS (8. 03) WL (9.67) ; ecological benefit index, CS (12.61) % WL (21.45) ; ornamental landscape index, CS (33.33) WL (32. 10); and recreation index,CS (23.60) 〈 WL (23.77). The comprehensive evaluation value of WL(85.98) was slightly higher than that of the CS (77.56).
出处 《西北林学院学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期259-263,共5页 Journal of Northwest Forestry University
基金 昆明市科学技术局科技合作与交流资助项目(昆科计字08H130105号)
关键词 金殿森林公园 模糊层次分析法 景观效益 生态效益 昆明市 Jindian Forest Park l fuzzy analytic hierarchy process landscape benefit ecological benefitKunming City
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献101

共引文献1235

同被引文献61

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部