摘要
以亚里士多德为代表的传统哲学将实践等同于道德实践,把技术实践排除在人的实践活动之外;康德虽然明确区分了技术实践与道德实践,揭示出二者同样遵循普遍法则,但最终未能将二者统一起来;黑格尔将道德实践与技术实践结合起来分析人的整个实践活动,但他却以抽象理性代替人的感性实践,仍未逃脱传统哲学之窠臼;马克思立足人的现实存在,将技术实践视为实践的基本形式,肯定技术实践在人类实践活动中的基础地位,确立了辩证唯物的整体实践观,实现了技术实践与道德实践、理论与实践的真正统一。
Traditional philosophy represented by Aristotle equals practice to moral practice. As a result, technological practice is excluded from human beings＇ practical activities. Although Kant clearly distinguishes technological practice from moral practice and reveals that they follow some universal rules, he eventually fails to unify the two. Hegel analyzes human beings＇ entire practice by integrating moral practice and technological practicei however, he replaces mankind＇s perceptual practice with abstract rationality, which is still confined to the pattern of traditional philosophy. Based on the human＇s realistic existence, Karl Marx regards technological practice as a fundamental form of practice and affirms its basic status in human beings＇ practical activities. Therefore, he establishes a holistic view of practice from the perspective of dialectical materialism and fulfills a real unification of technical practice and moral practice, and theory and practice.
出处
《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期446-452,共7页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(N100414002)
教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务资助项目(13JD710045)
中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2012M520644)
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(N120414003)
辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般资助项目(W2012041)
关键词
技术实践
道德实践
西方哲学
马克思
technological practice
moral practice
western philosophy
Karl Marx
