摘要
目的分析漯河市淋病与梅毒的流行特征,探讨相关危险因素,为预防控制措施的制定提供依据。方法对漯河市历年来的淋病与梅毒疫情资料进行描述性分析。结果漯河市自1991年有淋病疫情报告以来,截至2012年底累计报告淋病2 391例,淋病发病率一直呈上升趋势,1998年达到最高峰为13.01/10万,之后发病率一直呈下降趋势,2012年降至最低,为0.55/10万,2005年之前梅毒发病率一直低于淋病,2005年疫情有所上升,自2008年以来呈快速上升势头,由1991年的0.08/10万上升到2012年发病率达35.30/10万,1991—2012年累计报告梅毒3 566例,2004—2012年隐性梅毒(1 699例)占总病例数(3 293例)的51.59%。结论漯河市近年来梅毒发病率上升速度较快,隐性梅毒占比重较大,必须加强梅毒防治知识的宣传教育;加强对临床医生传染病诊断标准的培训,规范性病的报告,提高疫情报告准确率。
[ Objective ] To analyze the epidemic characteristics of gonorrhea and syphilis in Luohe City, explore the related risk fac- tors, and provide the basis for making prevention and control measures. [ Methods] The epidemic data of gonorrhea and syphilis in Luohe City in recent years were investigated with descriptive analysis. [ Results] Since the epidemic situation of gonorrhea had been reported in Luohe City in 1991, a total of 2391 gonorrhea cases were reported at the end of :2012. The incidence rate of gonorrhea showed rising trend, which reached the peak in 1998 { 13.01/lakh) , and then the incidence rate decreased, while that in 2012 was the lowest (0.55/lakh). Before 2005, the incidence rate of syphilis was lower than that of gonorrhea, and it increased after 2005. The incidence rate of syphilis showed a rapid growth momentum since 2008, which the incidence rate increased from 0.08/lakh in 1991 to 35.30/lakh in 2012. A total of 3 566 syphilis cases were reported from 1991-2012, and the latent syphilis (1 699 cases) during 2004-2012 accounted for 51.59% of the total cases (3 293 cases). [ Conclusion] The incidence rate of syphilis has in- creased rapidly in Luohe City in recent years, and the latent syphilis cases have accounted for a larger proportion. It is necessary to strengthen the publicity and education of knowledge about syphilis prevention and control, improve the training of infectious disease diagnostic code among clinicians, standardize the STD report, and enhance the accuracy rate of epidemic report.
出处
《职业与健康》
CAS
2013年第19期2517-2518,共2页
Occupation and Health
关键词
淋病
梅毒
流行特征
分析
Gonorrhea
Syphilis
Epidemic characteristics
Analysis