摘要
目的探讨自行留便和肛拭子两种方法便常规结果的差异,为肠道门诊的传染病筛查工作提供参考。方法将3个时间段的腹泻患者按采便方式分为自行留便和肛拭取便两组,根据便常规结果将两组患者分为细菌性痢疾、感染性腹泻及其他三类,对检测结果进行比较与分析。结果 2010年7-8月、2011年7-8月、2012年6-9月3个时间段细菌性痢疾分别占21.2%、17.8%、13.9%;感染性腹泻分别占12.5%、9.6%、14.8%;其他分别占66.3%、72.6%、71.3%;3个时间段两种取便方法比较后,经卡方检验,差异均无统计学意义;肛拭取便的细菌性痢疾、感染性腹泻、其他3种便常规分别占15.5%、13.3%、71.2%;自行留便分别为18.6%、11.3%、70.1%,经统计检验,肛拭取便与患者自行留便检验结果差异无统计学意义。结论自行留便和肛拭取便两种方法所得便常规结果在腹泻人群中分布无明显差异。
OBJECTIVE To compare and analyze the test results of faeces routine in two kinds of faeces obtainingmethods with anus swab and by patients self service so as to provide basis for the screening of infectious diseases inintestinal clinic. METHODS The diarrhea patients who were treated in the clinic in 3 time slots were enrolled in thestudy. The subjects were divided into two groups,then the patients were divided into the bacillary dysentery,infectious diarrhea, and other diarrhea diseases according to the result of routine test, the test results werestatistically analyzed. RESULTS The patients with bacillary dysentery accounted for 21. 2% in Jul-Aug 2010,17.8% in Jul-Aug 2011 , and 13. 9% in Jun-Sep 2012 ; the patients with infectious diarrhea accounted for 12. 5% ,9.6%, and 14. 8%,respectively; the patients with other diarrhea diseases accounted for 66. 3% , 72. 6% , and71. 3 %, respectively; the chi-square test indicated that the difference between the two kinds of faeces obtainingmethods during the three time periods was not significant. By means of faeces obtaining with anus test, the pa-tients with bacillary dysentery accounted for 15. 5 %,the patient with infectious diarrhea 13. 3 %,and the patientswith other diarrhea diseases 71. 2 % ; by means of faeces obtaining with patients self service, the patients with bacillary dysentery accounted for 18. 6%,the patients with infectious diarrhea 11. 3% , and the patients with other diarrhea diseases 70. 1 %,the statistical analysis showed that the difference in the test result between the faeces obtaining with anus test and the faeces obtaining with patients self service was not significant. CONCLUSION Thereis no significant difference in the result of faeces routine test for the diarrhea population between the two faeces obtaining methods.
出处
《中华医院感染学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第17期4336-4337,共2页
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金
铁道部科技研究开发项目(Z2011-018)
关键词
自行留便
肛拭取便
便常规
Obtaining faeces specimens by patients self service； Obtaining faeces specimen with anus swab； Faeces routine
