期刊文献+

微阵列比较基因组杂交技术在检测智力发育迟缓和先天性多发畸形患儿中的研究进展 被引量:1

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for detecting children with mental retardation and congenital multi-malformations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基因组拷贝数目变异(copy number variations,CNVs)是一种大小介于lkb~3Mb的DNA片段的变异,在人类基因组中广泛分布.近年来的研究表明,基因组拷贝数目变异与染色体微缺失和微重复综合征密切相关,而染色体微缺失、微重复综合征是导致智力障碍和多发畸形的重要因素,在围产儿和新生儿中发病率较高.虽然传统的细胞核型分析技术已经广泛应用于染色体异常的诊断,但其具有分辨率低、细胞培养的周期长等的局限性.微阵列比较基因组杂交(array comparative genomic hybridization,aCGH)技术是在CGH技术基础上发展起来的新的染色体病诊断技术,分辨率能够达到0.05 Mb,可以检测到一些核型分析检测不到的染色体的微小缺失或重复,是研究整个基因组缺失或重复的非常有应用前途的分子细胞遗传学技术.本综述主要阐述微阵列比较基因组杂交技术在研究智力发育异常和多发性畸形患儿中的应用进展. Copy number variations (CNVs) were the variations of the DNA fragment whose length ranges from 1 kb to 3 Mb.And these variations were widely distributed in the whole genome of human.Recent studies showed that CNVs closely related to the microdeletion and microduplication syndromes of chromosome.The microdeletion and microduplication syndromes of chromosome were the key factors in mental retardation and multi-malformations,which contributed to the high incidence in perinatal babies and neonates.Although the conventional cytogenetic karyotyping has been widely used in the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities,it has some limitations:low resolution,long period of cell culture,and so on.Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH),developing from CGH,was a new diagnostic technology for chromosomal disease.The resolution of aCGH reached 0.05 Mb,so aCGH can detect the microdeletion or microduplication that traditional karyotyping can' t detect and is a technology of molecular cytogenetics with great expectation in the research of microdeletion and microduplication.Our review was to describe the advances of aCGH for detecting the children with mental retardation and multi-malformations.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2013年第19期3071-3075,共5页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1方菊雄,陈嘉祥.Chromosomal Abnormalities and Gene Discovery in Schizophrenia[J].台湾精神医学,2007,21(4):242-252.
  • 2Baris HN,Tan WH,Kimonis VE,et al.Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization in a clinical setting[J].Am J Med Gnet A,2007,143A (21):2523-2533.
  • 3Fan YS,Jayakar P,Zhu H,et al.Detction of pathionogenic gene copy number variations in patients with mental retardation by genomwide oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization[J].Hum Mutat,2007,28(11):1124-1132.
  • 4Jaillard S,Drunat S,Bendavid C,et al.Identification of genecopy number variations in patints with mental retardation using array-CGH:Novel syndroms in a large French series[J].EurJ Med Gennt,2010,53(2):66-75.
  • 5Pickering DL,Eudy JD,Clney AH,et al.Arraybased comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 1176 consecutive clinical genetics inestigations[J].Genet Med,2008,10(4):262-266.
  • 6Shen Y,Irons M,Miller DT,et al.Development of a focused oligonucleotide-array comparative genomic hybridization chip for clinical diagnosis of genomic imbalance[J].Clin Chem,2007,53(12):2051-2059.
  • 7Miyake N,Shimokawa O,Harada N,et al.BAC array CGH reveals genomic aberrations in idiopathic mental retardation[J].Am J Med Genet A,2006,140(3):205-211.
  • 8Stumm M,Klopocki E,Gasiorek-Wiens A,et al.Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of an interstiial deletion 12p detected by prenatal diagnosis[J].Prenat Diagn,2007,27(5):475-478.
  • 9卢洪涌,崔英霞,经卉,夏欣一,史轶超,杨滨,姚兵,戈一峰,梁泉,李晓军,黄宇烽.经寡核苷酸微阵列比较基因组杂交技术证实的12号染色体短臂中间缺失的病例报告及文献复习[J].医学研究生学报,2010,23(7):706-709. 被引量:2
  • 10Lisi EC,Hamosh A,Doheny KF,et al.3q29 interstitial microduplication:a new syndrome in a three-generation family[J].Am J Med Genet A,2008,146A(5):601-609.

二级参考文献117

  • 1Wessendorf S, Fritz B, Wrobel G, et al. Automated screening for genomic imbalances using matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization. Lab Invest ,2002,82:47-60.
  • 2Ylstra B, Van den ljssel P, Carvalho B, et al. BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization ( array CGH). Nucleic Acids Res, 2006,34 : 445-450.
  • 3Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat. Genet, 1999,23:41-46.
  • 4Locke DP, Segraves R, Nicholls RD. BAC microarray analysis of 15q11-q13 rearrangements and the impact of segmental duplications. J Med Genet,2004, 41:175-182.
  • 5Zhao X, Li C, Paez JG, et al. An integrated view of copy number and allelic alterations in the cancer genome using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res, 2004, 64 : 3060- 3071.
  • 6Brennan C, Zhang Y, Leo C,et al. High-resolution global profiling of genomic alterations with long oligonucleotide microarray. Cancer Res, 2004, 64: 4744-4748.
  • 7Lucito R, Healy J, Alexander J, et al. Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: a high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation. Genome Res, 2003, 13: 2291- 2305.
  • 8Lupski JR. Structural variation in the human genome. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356:1169-1171.
  • 9Ballif BC, Rorem E, Sundin K, etal. Detection of low level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens. Am J Med Genet A ,2006,140:2757-2767
  • 10Qiao Y, Liu X, Harvard C, et al. Large-scale copy number variants (CNVs): Distribution in normal subjects and FISH/realtime qPCR analysis. BMC Genomics, 2007, 8 : 167.

共引文献15

同被引文献40

  • 1张颖新,刘雨生,何国平,周桂香,宋雅娴.51例稽留流产胎儿绒毛染色体分析[J].临床输血与检验,2011,13(2):157-159. 被引量:14
  • 2黄莉,谢丹尼,吕福通,柳青,陈一君,孙燕萍,牛向丽.孕早期绒毛膜细胞原位培养和染色体制备方法的初步研究[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2006,14(1):43-45. 被引量:5
  • 3D6ria S, Lima V, Carvalho B, et al. Application of touch FISH in the study of mosaic tetraploidy and maternal cell contamination in pregnancy losses [ J]. J Assist Repred C, enet, 2010,27 ( 1 1 ) :657-662.
  • 4Jobanputra V, Esteves C, Sobrino A, et al. Using FISH to in- crease the yield and accuracy of karyotypos from spontaneous a- bortion specimens[ J]. Prenat Diagn, 2011,31 (8) :755-759.
  • 5van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Brandenburg H, et al. Accura- cy of abnomud karyotypos after the analysis of both short-and long-term culture of chorionic villi[ J]. Prenat Diagn, 2000,20 ( 12 ) :956'-969.
  • 6Faas BH, Cirigliano V, Bui TH. Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies [ J ]. Semin Fetal Neonatal MOd, 2011 ,[6(2) :81-87.
  • 7Shearer BM, Thorland EC, Carlson AW, et al. Reflex fluores- cent in situ hybridization testing for unsuccessful product of con- ception cultures: a retrospective analysis of 5555 samples at- tempted by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hy- bridization[J]. Genet Med, 2011,13(6) :545-552.
  • 8Mennicke K, Yang J, Hinrichs F, et al. Validation of primed in situ labeling for interphase analysis of chromosomes 18, X, and Y in uncultured amniocytes [ J ]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2003, 18(2) :114-121.
  • 9Halder A, Jaln M, Ghaudhary I. Rapid detection of chromo- some X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 aneuploidios by primed in situ labeling/synthesis technique [ J ]. Indian J Hum Genet, 2013, 19(1) :14-17.
  • 10Anguiano A, Wang BT, Wang SR, et al. Spectral karyotyping for identification of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities at a national reference laboratory [ J ]. Mol Cytogenet, 2012,5 : 3.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部