期刊文献+

长白山不同海拔泥炭地泥炭藓残体的分解 被引量:2

Decomposition of Sphagnum Litter in 4 Peatlands of the Changbai Mountains along an Altitudinal Gradient
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在当前气候变化的背景下,沿海拔梯度,选择长白山4处泥炭地为研究地,以喙叶泥炭藓和大泥炭藓为分解材料,于丘上和丘间两种生境进行分解实验,研究物种、生境以及海拔下降导致的增温对泥炭藓残体分解速率的影响。结果表明,增温以及生境和物种差异均影响泥炭藓残体的分解,即增温促进泥炭藓分解,丘间生境更利于泥炭藓残体分解,喙叶泥炭藓分解率高于大泥炭藓。比较而言,物种即分解材料的内在质地是影响植物残体分解的主要因素,即高氮含量和低C/N比的喙叶泥炭藓更易分解。增温与物种及增温与生境间均存在交互作用,可以改变生境和物种差异对泥炭藓残体分解的影响,可能会对泥炭地碳汇功能产生深远影响。 Sphagnum is the dominant and mainly peat-forming plant component in northern peatlands. The substan- tial function of carbon sequestration for peatlands is due to the slow decomposition of Sphagnum. Until now, we still know very little about the main factors that affect Sphagnum decomposition in Northern China under the current cli- mate change background. Along an altitudinal gradient, we selected Sphagnumfallax and S. palustre litter as ma- terials in two habitats hummocks and hollows of four peatlands, Jinchuan, Hani, Yuanchi and Chichi in the Chang- bai Mountains, to study the effects of warming namely altitudinal decrease, habitat and species on decomposition rate of Sphagnum litter. The results show that, slight warming promoted Sphagnum litter decomposition; the decom- position rate of S. fallax was higher than S. palustre; hollow habitats were beneficial to Sphagnum decomposition. Overall species namely intrinsic quality of litter was the main factor to affect Sphagnum decomposition. S. fallax with high nitrogen content and low C/N was more easily to decompose. Interaction between warming and species and between warming and habitat can change species and habitats effects on decomposition, and it may create a far- reaching impact on carbon sink function of peatlands.
出处 《山地学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期442-447,共6页 Mountain Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40971036 40830535) 环保公益性行业科研专项资金项目(201109067)资助~~
关键词 泥炭藓 长白山 海拔 变暖 分解 Sphagnum Changbai Mountains elevation warming decomposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Ise T,Dunn A L,Wofsy S C,et al.High sensitivity of peat decomposition to climate change through water-table feedback[J].Nature Geoscience,2008,1:763-766.
  • 2Tomas H.Habitat and species controls on Sphagnum production and decomposition in a mountain raised bog[J].Boreal Environment Research,2009,14:947-958.
  • 3Moore T R,Bubier J L,Bledzki L A.Litter decomposition in temperate peatlands:the effect of substrate and sites[J].Ecosystems,2007,10:949-963.
  • 4Gerdol R,Petraglia A,Bragazza L,et al.Nitrogen deposition interacts with climate in affecting production and decomposition rates in Sphagnum mosses[J].Global Change Bioligy,2007,13:1810-1821.
  • 5Hobbie S E.Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra[J].Ecological Monographs,1996,66:503-522.
  • 6Limpens J,Berendse F.How litter quality affects mass loss and N loss from decomposing Sphagnum[J].Oikos,2003,103:537-547.
  • 7Johnson L C,Damman A W H.Species controlled Sphagnum decay on a south Swedish raised bog[J].Oikos,1991,61:234-242.
  • 8Hogg E H,Malmer N,Wallen B.Microsite and regional variation in the potential decay rate of Sphagnum magellanicum in south Swedish raised bogs[J].Ecography,1994,17:50-59.
  • 9Gorham E.Northern peadands:role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warring[J].Ecological Applications,1991,1:182-195.
  • 10Shaver G R,Canadell J,Chapin III F S,et al.Global warming and terrestrial ecosysterms:a conceptual framework for analysis[J].Bioscience,2000,50:871-882.

二级参考文献34

  • 1Callaway RM.Positive Interactions and Interdependence in Plant Communities.Dordrecht:Springer,2007.
  • 2Connell JH.On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition:Evidence from field experi-ments.The American Naturalist,1983,122:661-696.
  • 3Schoener TW.Field experiments on interspecific compe-tition.The American Naturalist,1983,122:240-285.
  • 4Grime JP.Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes.Chichester:Wiley,1979.
  • 5Bruno JF,Stachowicz JJ,Bertness MD.Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory.Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2003,18:119-125.
  • 6Bertness MD,Callaway RM.Positive interactions in communities.Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1994,9:191-193.
  • 7Callaway RM,Brooker RW,Choler P,et al.Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.Nature,2002,417:844-848.
  • 8Cavieres LA,Badano EI,Sierra-Almeida A,et al.Pos-itive interactions between alpine plant species and the nurse cushion plant Laretia acaulis do not increase with elevation in the Andes of central Chile.New Phytolo-gist,2006,169:59-69.
  • 9Maestre FT,Cortina J.Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress?A test from a semi-arid steppe.Pro-ceedings of the Royal Society of London B,2004,271:S331-S333doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0181.
  • 10Sthultz CM,Gehring CA,Whitham TG.Shifts from competition to facilitation between a foundation tree and a pioneer shrub across spatial and temporal scales in a semiarid woodland.New Phytologist,2007,173:135-145.

共引文献9

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部