期刊文献+

减数下颌2个前磨牙矫治成人骨性反牙合的临床研究 被引量:4

2 Lower premolar extraction in correction of adult skeletal cross-bite malocclusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价采用减数下颌2个前磨牙矫治成人骨性反牙合病例的临床效果。方法选择18~30岁骨性反牙合临界病例18例,拔除下颌2个第一或第二前磨牙,分析治疗前后X线头颅侧位片各项指标的变化。结果所有病例在矫治结束后磨牙均变为完全Ⅲ类关系,尖牙为Ⅰ类关系,覆牙合覆盖正常。患者硬组织改变没有显著性(P≥0.05)。L1-MP角平均减小8.1°,U1-L1角平均增大7.7°,L1-NB角平均减小7.3°,L1-NB距平均减小4.8 mm,差异均有显著性(P<0.01)。软组织侧貌改善明显,Li-E距、Li-H距、Li-RL2距平均减小量分别为3.2、3.4和4.1 mm,差异均有显著性(P<0.01)。结论采用减数下颌2个前磨牙矫治成人骨性反牙合病例在临床上是一种较好的矫治方法,矫治后咬合关系良好,侧貌有向直面型发展的趋势。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of the orthodontic treatment after extracting two mandibular premolars in adult skeletal cross-bite subjects. Methods Eighteen borderline adult skeletal cross-bite cases from 18 years old to 30 years old were stud- ied. In these cases, first or second mandibular premolars were extracted. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment for analysis of all indicators. Results At the end of the treatment, normal overjet and overbite were established in class Ill molar relationship and class I canine relationship. There appeared to be no significant hard tissue changes(P≥0.05). L1-MP angles decreased by 8.1 °on average, U1-L1 angles increased by 7.7°on average, L1-NB angles decreased by 7.3°on average, L1-NB dis- tances decreased by 4.8 mm on average. Statistically significant differences were found in these changes( P 〈 0. 01 ). The soft-tissue profile improved significantly. Li-E distances, Li-H distances and Li-RL2 distances decreased by 3.2 mm,3.4 mm and 4.1 mm on av- erage respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in these changes(P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions Success in the treatment of adult skeletal cross-bite can be achieved clinically by extraction of 2 lower premolars. All the patients get good occlusion and straight profile tendency.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2013年第9期597-600,共4页 Stomatology
基金 国家科技攻关计划基金(2004BA720A25)
关键词 成人骨性反[牙合] 掩饰性拔牙矫治 软组织侧貌 adult skeletal cross-bite extraction therapy for camouflage soft tissue profile
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA, et al. Components of class m malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents[ J]. Angle Orthod, 1986, 56(1) : 7 -313.
  • 2Gu Y, Rabie ABM. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior erossbites[ J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000,117 (6) :691 - 699.
  • 3Tollaro I, Baeeetti T, Franchi L. Craniofacial change induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofaeial Orthop, 1996, 109 (3) :310 - 318.
  • 4Uner O, Yuksel S, Ucunbe N. Long-term evaluation after chincup treatment[J]. EurJ Orthod,1995, 17(2):135-141.
  • 5Ning F, Duan Y, Huo N. Camouflage treatment in skeletal class Ill easescombined with sever crowding by extractionof four premo- lar[J]. Orthodontic Waves, 2009,68(1):80-87.
  • 6Lew KK. Soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment of Chinese adults with class m malocclusion[ J]. IntJ Adult Orth- odon Orthognath Surg, 1990, 5 ( 1 ) :59 - 65.
  • 7Demir A, Uysal T, Sari Z, et al. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacialstructures in class H division 1 mandibular retrog- nathie patients[J]. EurJ Orthod, 2005, 27(5): 524-531.
  • 8Kerr WJS, Miller S, Dawber JE. Class III malocclusion: surgeryor orthodontics[J]. Br J Orthod,1992,19( 1 ) :21 -24.
  • 9曾祥龙,林久祥,黄金芳.骨性前牙反殆正畸限度的初步探讨[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1985,3(3):233-237.
  • 10Xu TM, Lin JX, Huang JF,et al. Effect of the vertical force com- ponent of class II elastics on the anterior intrusive force of maxil- lary archwire[J]. Eur J Orthod,1992,14(4) :280 -284.

二级参考文献22

  • 1大西馨.成人安格尔氏Ⅲ类(毛氏Ⅱ~1类)错合的矫治—拔除磨牙及用J形钩口外牵引[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1995,11(S1):6-6. 被引量:1
  • 2Lew KK.Foong WC.Horlzontal skeletal typing in an ethnic Chinese population with ture Class Ⅲ malocelusions.Br J Orthod.1993.20:19-23.
  • 3Guyer EC.Ellis EE 3rd.McNamara JA,Jr et al.Components of Class Ⅲ malocelusion in juveniles and adolescents.Angle Orthod.1986.56:7-30.
  • 4Gu Y.Rabie AB.Hagg U.Treatment effects of simple fixed uppliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2000.117:691-699.
  • 5Uner O.Yuksel S,Ucuncu N,Long-term evaluation after chincup treatment.Eur J Orthod,1995,17:135-141.
  • 6Pike JB,Sundheim RA.Skeletal and dental responses to orthognathic surgical treatment.Angle Orthod,1997,67:447-454.
  • 7Graber TM,Vanarsdall RL.Orthodontics-current principles and techniques.3rd ed .St.Louis:Mosby,2000,375-470,721-748.
  • 8Ackerman JL.Proffit WR,Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics:treatment planning guidelines.Angle Othod,1997,67:327-336
  • 9Sato S,Case report:developmental characterization of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion.Angle Orthod,1997,64:105-112
  • 10Kesling PC,Rocke RT,Kesling CK Treatment with Tip-Edge brackets and differential tooth movement .Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1991,99:387-401

共引文献70

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部