摘要
目的:评估Amicus3.2版本软件,比较Amicus与Trima采集双份血小板的时间。方法:平均分配献血员,保证献血员条件无差异情况下统计Amicus和Trima双份血小板采集时间。结果:在产品和产量抽样均合格,平均体重、身高、采前血小板计数均差异无统计学意义的前提下,平均采集时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:Amicus3.2版本软件缩短了双份血小板的程序时间,Amicus3.2版本采集时间上优于Trima。
Objective： Evaluation of Amicus3.2 software,to compare double-dose platelet collection procedure time on Amicus versus Trima. Method： Break donors into two groups evenly hy weight, height, and preapheresis platelet count, to evaluate double-dose platelet collection procedure time on Amicus and Trima. Result All the platelet product yield passed QC screening test. There was significant difference （P〈0.05） between Amicus and Trima double close collection time, at the same donor group with same average weight, height, and preapheresis platelet count. Conclusion： Amicus3.2 improves platelet apheresis collection speed and it is faster than Trima on double dose plalelet collection.
出处
《临床血液学杂志（输血与检验）》
CAS
2013年第5期715-716,共2页
Journal of Clinical Hematology(Blood Transfusion & Laboratory Medicine)
