摘要
如何理解与认定"以非法占有为目的"是诈骗犯罪主观方面的争议之一,非法占有目的是诈骗罪必备的主观要件,但对非法占有目的的理解学界观点不一。我国《刑法》中并没有在诈骗罪等取得罪条文中都规定以非法占有为主观要素。非法占有目的作为一个定罪要件,由于其属于主观心理态度,无法像客观要件那样客观地存在,程序上需依刑事推定予以认定。为了贯彻无罪推定原则,刑事审判中进行刑事推定需要遵循诉讼规律。推定作为司法证明的重要方法之一,可以解决法律规范要求的某类要件,特别是主观要件难以被证明时,缓解证明上的困难,合理分配当事人的证明责任,推进案件审理的进程,达到一定司法政策的要求和效果。准确认定行为人的"非法占有目的",正确区分诈骗罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的界限,实现法律保障人权、打击犯罪的功能。
As the subject intent of crime is hard to prove during the process of judicial proof, it is urgent problem to identity ＇ illegal possession intent＇ in the crime of fraud in judicial prac- tice. Criminal presumption is a kind of distribution for the burden of proof. Its accuracy stems from the normality and rules of thumb for the connections between things. It is the special rules to prove the case of facts allowed by law. Meanwhile, it is both a proof transfer mechanism and facts finding rules. Through the reasonable use of presumption rules, we could solve the proof predica- ment for the ＇ illegal possession intent＇ in the crime of Fraud.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第10期9-18,共10页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
非法占有目的
推定
经验法则
高度盖然性
illegal possession intent presumption relevance burden of proof
