期刊文献+

Fischer’s评分结合MR影像报告数据系统在乳腺病灶定性中的应用价值 被引量:7

Fischer's Scoring System Combined with MR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺磁共振Fischer’s评分结合MR影像报告数据系统(BI—RADS)鉴别乳腺病灶良恶性的临床应用价值。方法对我院乳腺外科触诊可疑乳腺肿物,乳腺钼靶或乳腺B超检查发现病变但不能明确诊断的患者行乳腺MRI检查。着重对MRI发现病变的4J4例女性患者进行分析,年龄25~7l岁,平均(45.1l±11.04)岁。按照2003年美国放射学会提出的针对乳腺MRBI—RADS对所发现的乳腺病灶进行分析,将病灶分为点状病灶、肿块及非肿块样强化病灶3大类。同时结合Fischer’S评分与MRBI—RADS对病变进行评估、分级,并与术后病理结果对照,计算Fischer’S评分与BI—RADS系统诊断病变的准确性。结果44例共发现47个病灶,乳腺MRI表现为点状强化病灶2个,肿块样强化病灶39个,非肿块样强化病灶6个。病理证实的良性病灶25个,恶性病灶22个。Fischer’S评分结合BI—RADS系统诊断的准确性为87%[(19+22)/47],敏感性为76%(19/25),特异性为100%(22/22),误诊率即假阳性率0%,漏诊率34%。结论Fischer’s评分结合BI—RADS系统将乳腺病变的形态学表现与动态增强表现有机结合,为乳腺癌的诊断规范了诊断步骤及标准,有助于乳腺病变的定性诊断,尤其对于MRI表现为肿块样病变良恶性的鉴别诊断准确性高于非肿块样病变。 Objective To investigate the value of Fischer' s scoring system combined with MR breast imaging reporting and data system ( MR BI RADS ) in differential diagnosis of breast lesions. Methods Forty four female patients ( age range 25 - 71years, mean age of 45.11 ± 11.04years) with breast lesions underwent MRI examination. According to MR BI RADS (2003 by ACR) , the breast lesions were divided into three main categories: focus or foci, masses and non mass like enhancement. We analyzed these lesions by Fischer' s scoring system and then compared the results with pathology. The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the Fischer' s scoring system combined with MR BI RADS in the diagnosis of breast lesions were calculated. Results 47 lesions were found in 44 patients. There were 2 foci, 39 masses and 6 non- mass like enhancements, of which histopathology proven 25 benign and 22 malignant. The correct rate, sensitivity, speci- ficity of Fischer' s scoring system and BI RADS was 87% [ (19 ± 22)/471, 76% (19/25) and 100% (22/22) respective- ly. The false positive rate and false negative rate were 0% and 34%. Conclusion Fischer' s scoring system combined with MR BI RADS is helpful for distinguishing benign from malignant breast mass lesions, which can provide an objective standard and criteria in diagnosis of breast cancer.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期1432-1435,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:10151001002000006)
关键词 Fischer’s评分系统 肿块 非肿块样强化 乳腺 Fischer' s scoring system Mass Non-mass like enhancement Breast
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Fisher U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preopera- tive contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Ra- diology, 1999,213 : 881.
  • 2Tradivon AA, Athanasiou A, Thibault F, et, al. Breast imaging and reporting data system (BIRADS): magnetic resonance imaging. EJR,2007,61:212.
  • 3Kuhl C. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging. In:Elisabeth E Morris, Laura Lieber, editors. Breast MRI: diagnosis and interven- tion. 1 st ed. New York, USA : Springer,2005,70.
  • 4Hanaa A1-Khawari, Reji Athyal,Agnes Kovacs, et al. Accuracy of the Fischer scoring system and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System in identification of malignant breast lesions. Ann Saudi Med, 2009,29:280.
  • 5马凤华,赵泽华,刘文瑾,李莉.乳腺癌组织类型的动态增强MRI鉴别诊断[J].上海医学影像,2011,20(3):191-194. 被引量:1
  • 6Ginsburg OM,Richard R. Breast cancer:a neglected disease for the majority of affected women worldwide. Breast J,2011,17 :289.
  • 7朱萍,王亚非,黄昊,刘琴芳,谌业荣,单秀红,谭继善.MR扩散加权成像表观扩散系数在乳腺结节病变诊断中的应用价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(12):1117-1121. 被引量:36
  • 8Riham H, EI Khouli, Michael A, et, al. Diffusion-weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional. 3.0-T Breast MR Imaging. Radiology ,2010,256:64.

二级参考文献21

  • 1倪建明,沈天真,陈星荣.脑组织ADC值定量研究的影响因素分析[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2005,11(1):1-5. 被引量:7
  • 2汪晓红,耿道颖,顾雅佳,彭卫军.乳腺恶性肿瘤的MRI表现及病理对照研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2005,11(2):100-106. 被引量:20
  • 3高佩虹,赵斌,蔡世峰,王光彬,彭洪娟.乳腺肿块动态增强及高分辨MRI表现与病理相关性研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2005,15(7):557-561. 被引量:21
  • 4蔡世峰,赵斌,王光彬,于台飞.不同类型正常乳腺表观扩散系数值差异的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(2):176-179. 被引量:12
  • 5顾雅佳,冯晓源,唐峰,彭卫军,毛健,杨文涛.乳腺肿瘤的MRI扩散特征及参数选定[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):451-456. 被引量:45
  • 6Nermin T, Hakki M K, Ozerk O O. Dynamic magnetic resoncance imaging in determining histopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancers[J].Euro J Radiol 2005,53(2): 199-205.
  • 7Dominique V, Veronique D, Pierre A E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability and extracellular volume fraction of breast tumors by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced relaxometry[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,2007,25(3) :293-302.
  • 8Su M Y, Chenung Y C, Fruehauf J P, et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer[J]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging,2003,18(4):467-477.
  • 9Huang W, Fisher P R, Dulaimv K, et al. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specifieity[J]. Radiology,2004,232(2):585-591.
  • 10Takeda Y, Yoshikawa K. Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging parameters and histological types of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast[J]. Biomed Pharmac, 2005,59(3):115- 121.

共引文献35

同被引文献42

  • 1侯伟伟,于小平.乳腺叶状肿瘤的MRI表现特征及病理对照研究[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(4):392-397. 被引量:14
  • 2龚西腧,丁华野.乳腺病理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社.2009.390.
  • 3Timmers J M,van Doorne-Nagtegaal H J ,Zonderland H M, et al. The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) in the dutch breast cancer screening programme., its role as an assessment and stratification tool[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012,22(8) : 1717-- 1723.
  • 4Essing M,Shiroishi M S, Nguyen T B, et al. Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions[J]. AJR, 2013,200 (1) :24--34.
  • 5E1 Khouli R H, Macura K J,Kamel I R, et al. 3-Tdynamic contrast- enhanced MRI of the breast pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis[J]. AJR,2011,197(6): 1498-- 1505.
  • 6Huang W, Tudorica L A, Li X, et al. Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast- enhanced MR imaging[J]. Radiology,2011,261(2) : 394--403.
  • 7Barrett T,Brechbiel M,Bernardo M, et al. MRI of tumor angio- gensis[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007,26 (2) : 235 -- 249.
  • 8Koo H R, Cho N, Song I C, et al. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers[J]. J Magn Resort Imaging, 2012,36 (1) :145--151.
  • 9Loveless M E, Halliday J, Liess C, et al. A quantitative comparison of the influence of individual versus population-derived vascular input functions on dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI in small animals [J]. Magn Reson Med,2012,67(1) :226--236.
  • 10钱吉芳,马强华,叶建军,杨晓萍,陈纲,罗樱,朱晓华.MRI三维动态增强减影技术早期增强形态对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2008,24(4):530-533. 被引量:18

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部