期刊文献+

乘用车2种碰撞前排乘员伤害比对 被引量:2

Comparison on Front-row Occupant's Injury of Vehicle Between Full Frontal and Frontal Offset Collision Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了适应新版C-NCAP管理规则正面偏置碰撞速度提高到64 km/h的规定,分别对9款乘用车进行了2012版C-NCAP中正面全宽和偏置2种碰撞试验,通过对前排乘员试验结果进行比较分析,指出乘用车2种碰撞形态下的各性能指标值十分相近,头部、颈部及大腿是满分点,胸部压缩变形量和副驾驶侧乘员左侧小腿上部胫骨指数是主要失分点,两侧乘员的内侧大腿压缩力是可能失分点,为前排乘员约束系统的开发提供了指导。 Tests of full frontal collision and frontal offset collision stipulated in 2012 C-NCAP have been done respectively for nine models to allow the collision speed to reach to 64 km/h issued in C-NCAP during the full frontal collision. After the comparison on the frontal row occupant's injury index of vehicle between full frontal and full offset collisions, it points out that the indexes are similar in 2 different collision tests for passenger ear. The indexes of head, neck and leg are points for making good score, the chest deflection index and the index for upper tibia of left leg in assistant driver's side are mainly points fnr making bad score, at the same time the index of the inner thigh deflection may be point for making bad senre, it provides the reference for developing frontal row occupant's restraint system.
出处 《汽车工程师》 2013年第9期44-48,共5页 Automotive Engineer
关键词 正面全宽碰撞 正面偏置碰撞 乘员伤害 C—NCAP 约束系统开发 Full frontal collision Frontal offset collision Occupant injury C-NCAP Restraint system development
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献5

  • 1商恩义.正面碰撞中安全带对乘员伤害的影响的研究,第七届国际汽车交通安全学术会议论文集[A],中国,长沙,2009.
  • 250^th PERCENTILE MALE HYBRID Ⅲ TEST DUMMY. Society of Automotive Engimeers Dummy Testing Equipment Subcommittee SAE Engineering Aid 23, June 1998.
  • 3GB11551-2003.乘用车正面碰撞的乘员保护.
  • 4中国汽车技术研究中心.中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP)(2009年版).
  • 5SAE J211 -1 SURFACE VEHICLE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE, REV.MAR95.

共引文献50

同被引文献19

  • 1张春林,崔来友,谈诚,王光泉,孔凌嘉.人体足底受力测试及其分析[J].北京理工大学学报,2004,24(7):567-570. 被引量:14
  • 2白鹏.两种正面碰撞标准的试验对比[J].天津汽车,2005(2):21-25. 被引量:7
  • 3中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP),http://www.c-ncap.org/index.html.
  • 4孙振东.朱海涛.刘玉光.正面碰撞试验中乘员小腿伤害特性研究.第五届国际汽车交通安全学术会议论文集.长沙,2007.
  • 5中国汽车技术研究中心.中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP)2012 版[S/OL]. (2012-09-03). http://www.c-ncap.org.
  • 6European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP).Assessment protocol-adult Iccupant protection (Version6.0, Jan 2013) [S/OL]. (2013-01-05). http//www.euroncap.coin.
  • 7张耀辉,鞠春贤,岳国辉,等.正面碰撞中假人膝盖滑移量分析[C]//马德广.第15届汽车安全技术学术会议论文集.芜湖:安徽师范大学出版社,2012: 339-345.
  • 8Gokhale A V,Saravate V B, Chalipat S, et al. Femur andknee injury reduction by use of knee bolsters in frontalcrashes [R]. SAE Paper, 2007-26-001.
  • 9Woodman D. High efficiency energy absorber for kneeimpact [R]. SAE Paper, 2003-01-1170.
  • 10Hesse S, BlaBer S, Hoffmann J. Parameter study ondifferent factors influencing lower extremity injuries [R].SAE Paper, 2001-06-0181.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部