期刊文献+

多孔钽金属髋臼假体在初次全髋关节置换中的应用 被引量:3

Application of Porous Tantalum Metal Acetabular Prosthesis on Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察多孔钽金属髋臼假体进行初次全髋关节置换的临床效果。方法自2006年9月—2010年3月我科对53例(59髋)采用多孔钽金属髋臼假体进行初次全髋关节置换术,应用临床功能及患者满意度评价、影像学评估来评价疗效。结果 42例获得随访,平均随访(33.0±7.4)个月,与术前比较,术后髋关节活动范围及临床功能评价均显著提高(P<0.05)。影像学检查无明显假体移位、假体周围骨溶解情况的发生,其中34例(80.1%)在假体骨界面发现有明显的骨长入。结论多孔钽金属髋臼假体是初次全髋关节置换的理想假体,能有效改善功能,假体骨长入明显,对年轻患者或老年骨质疏松患者尤其适合。 [Abstract] Objective To observe the effect of primary total hip arthroplasty by using porous tantalum metal acetabular prosthesis. Methods Curative effects of 53 patients (59 hips), who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with porous tantalum metal acetabular prosthesis, during September 2006 and March 2010 in our department were evaluated by clinical function, satisfaction questionnaire and radiographic assessment. Results A total of 42 patients were followed up with an average time of (33.0 ± 7.4) months. The range of motion of hip joint and clinical function after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P 〈 0. 05). Radiographic examinations showed there were no significant prosthesis malposition and periprosthetic osteolysis and 34 patients (80.1%) was found obvious bone ingrowth. Conclusion Porous tantalum metal acetabular prosthesis may effectively improve function and bone ingrowth of prosthesis, so it is ideal for primary total hip arthroplasty, especially for younger or elderly patients with osteoporosis.
出处 《解放军医药杂志》 CAS 2013年第9期32-34,43,共4页 Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
基金 北京市科委科技攻关项目(D101100049910004)
关键词 关节成形术 置换 髋臼 髋假体 Arthroplasty, replacement, hip Tantalum Acetabulum Hip prosthesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM, Kroger HP. Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes alter total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:600-5.
  • 2Petersen MM, Nielsen PT, Lauritzen JB, Lund B. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 25 knees. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:513-6.
  • 3Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM, Kroger HP. Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Knee. 2004;11:297-302.
  • 4Petersen M M, Jensen NC, Gehrchen PM, Nielsen PK, Nielsen PT. The relation between trabecular bone strength and bone mineral density assessed by dual photon and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in the proximal tibia. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59:311-4.
  • 5Macheras GA, Papagelopoulos PJ, Kateros K, Kostakos AT, Baltas D, Karachalios TS. Radiological evaluation of the metal-bone interface of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:304-9.
  • 6Gruen TA, Poggie RA, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Lewis RJ, O' Keefe TJ, Stulberg SD, Sutherland CJ. Radiographic evaluation of a monoblock acetabular component: a multicenter study with 2- to 5-year results. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:369-78.
  • 7Levine B, Della Valle C J, Jacobs JJ. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:646-55.
  • 8Saari T, Uvehammer J, Carlsson L, Regner L, Karrholm J. Joint area constraint had no influence on bone loss in proximal tibia 5 years after total knee replacement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:798-803.
  • 9Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B, Roberts J, Gallacher SJ, Meek RM. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:606-13.
  • 10Li MG, Nilsson KG. Changes in bone mineral density at the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up of 28 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:40-7.

共引文献3

同被引文献79

  • 1嵇伟平,韩培,蒋垚.纳米骨植入材料表面结构及作用机制研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2007,28(2):125-127. 被引量:7
  • 2Jafari SM,Bender B,Coyle C,et aI.Dotantalum and titanium cups show similar vesults in revision hip artroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2010;468(2):459-465.
  • 3Cohen R.A porous tantalum trabecular metal: Basic science. Am J Orthop.2002; 31(4):216-217.
  • 4Zardiackas LD,Parsell DE,Dillon LD,et aI.Structure, metallurgy and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam.J Biomed Mater Res.2001 ;58(2): 180-187.
  • 5Hacking SA,Bobyn JD,Toh K,et al.Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum.J Biomed Mater Res. 2000; 52(4):631-638.
  • 6Shimko DA,Shimko VF, Sander EA,et aI.Effect of porosity on the fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties of tantalum scaffolds.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomatcr. 2005;73(2):315-324.
  • 7Heiner AD,Brown TD,Poggie RA.Structural efficacy of a novel porous tantalum implant for osteonecrosis grafting. Trans Orthop Res Soc.2001;26:480.
  • 8Zhang Y, Ahn PB,Fitzpatrick DC,et al.lnterfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone. cortical bone,and a novel porous tantalum biomateriaI.J Musculoskeletal Res. 1999;3(4): 245-251.
  • 9Balla VK, Bose S,Davies NM,et al.Tantalum-A bioactive metal for implants. J Metals.2010;62(7):61-64.
  • 10Matsuno H,Yokoyama A,Watari F, et al.Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium,tantalum and rhenium. Biomaterials. 2001;22: 1253-1262.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部