期刊文献+

2011年教育部直属72所高校办学效率研究--基于DEA模型 被引量:32

Study on the Running Efficiency of 72 Higher Educational Institutions Directly Under Ministry of Education in 2011——Based on DEA Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 教学质量是高校办学效率研究的一个难点,高校办学效率的评估工作面临着教学与科研两方面投入与产出的数量、质量难以精确统计的难题。根据《教育部直属高校2011年基本情况统计资料汇编》,本研究采用基于变换参考集的DEA排序方法,引入了声誉和ESI指标分别反映教学质量和科研国际影响力,将科研产出分为人文社科和自然科学科研成果得分,分析了2011年教育部直属72所高校的办学效率。结果显示,高校平均办学效率为70.24%,不同类型高校有一个合理的效率值和排名,地区经济发展水平是影响高校办学效率的显著因素。 Quality of teaching is a difficult point in the study on running efficiency of higher educational institutions. Evaluation on the running efficiency of higher educational institutions is facing the problem that it is difficult to accurately measure the quantity and quality of both teaching and researching performance. Based on 〈 Basic Statistical Data Collection of Higher Educational Institutions Directly under Ministry of Education in 2011 〉, the research utilizes the DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set, introduces the reputation and ESI indices to reflect the teaching quality and research international influence respectively, divides the scientific research products into scores of humanities & social sciences and natural science and analyzes the running efficiencies of 72 higher educational institutions directly under Ministry of Education in 2011. Results show that the average efficiency is 70.24%, different types of higher educational institutions have reasonable efficiencies and rankings and the regional economic development level influences the efficiencies significantly.
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第11期1-7,共7页 China Higher Education Research
基金 中国人民大学研究生科学研究基金项目“2008-2010我国‘985工程’高校办学效率的DEA评价研究”(项目编号:13XNH189)的研究成果
关键词 DEA 高校办学效率 变动规模报酬 权重约束 DEA efficiency of higher education institutions variable returns to scale weights constrains
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Beasley J E. Comparing university departments[J]. Omega,1990,18(02):171-183.
  • 2Beasley J E. Determining teaching and research efficiencies [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1995: 441-452.
  • 3Johnes G, Johnes J. Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of data envelopment analysis[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 1993: 332-347.
  • 4Johnes J. Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK Universities 1993 [J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(01): 443-456.
  • 5Colbert A, Levary R R, Shaner M C. Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 125(03): 656-669.
  • 6Kao C, Hung H. Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study[J]. Omega, 2008, 36(04): 653-664.
  • 7Athanassopoulos A D, Shale E. Assessing the comparative efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by the means of Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Education Economics, 1997,5(02):117-134.
  • 8Avkiran N K. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2001, 35(01): 57- 80.
  • 9Abbott M, Doucouliagos C. The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis[J]. Economics of Education review, 2003, 22(01): 89-97.
  • 10Johnes J. Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2006, 25(03): 273-288.

二级参考文献20

  • 1邱均平,赵蓉英,余以胜.中国高校科研竞争力评价的理念与实践[J].高教发展与评估,2005,21(1):31-35. 被引量:39
  • 2.我国首次完成211工程大学人均效率评价[EB/OL].http://www.edu.cn/20021212/3074034.shtml,.
  • 3JOHN RUGGIERO. Performance evaluation in education. modelling educational production[A]. WILLIAM W COOPER, etc. Handbook On Data Envelopment Analysis[C]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 323-348.
  • 4COELLI T. Assessing the performance of Australian universities using data envelopment analysis(Internal Report) [A]. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis[C], University of New England. 1994.
  • 5AVKIRAN N K. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis [J]. Soeio-Eeonomie Planning Sciences, 2001,(35) :57-80.
  • 6ABBOTT M & COUCOULIAGOS C. The efficiency of Australian universities : a data envelopment analysis [J]. Economies of Education Review, 2003, (22) :89-97.
  • 7AHN T, etc. Some statistical and DEA valuations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning[J]. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 1988,22 (6) : 259-269.
  • 8ROBST J. Cost efficiency in public higher education institutions[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2001,72(6) :730-750.
  • 9SALERNO C S. On the technical and allocative efficiency of research-intensive higher education institutions[Z]. The Pennsylvania State University: University Park, PA,2002.
  • 10ATHANASSOPOULOS A D, SHALE E. Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education Institutions in the UK by means of data envelopment analysis[J]. Education Economics, 1997,5(2) :117-134.

共引文献27

同被引文献345

引证文献32

二级引证文献198

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部