期刊文献+

单节段颈椎动态稳定器植入术对颈椎曲度和活动度的影响 被引量:7

Effects of single-level dynamic cervical implantation on the cervical alignment and range of motion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察颈椎动态稳定器(dynamic cervical implant,DCI)治疗颈椎病术后颈椎曲度和活动度的变化情况,探讨其应用的安全性及有效性。方法2009年8月至2012年1月,收治符合DCI植入指征的颈椎病患者17例,其中男7例,女10例;年龄36~53岁,平均43.4岁。脊髓型颈椎病4例,神经根型颈椎病13例。病变节段:C3-4 1例,C4-5 6例,C5-6例,C6-7 4例。17例均行颈前路椎间盘切除、椎管减压后DcI植入术。测量术前和末次随访时DCI植入节段及相邻节段的活动度(range of motion,ROM)、DCI植入节段脊柱功能单位(functional spinal unit,FSU)Cobb’s角和颈椎整体曲度(C2-7Cobb’s角)。采用Miyazaki颈椎间盘退变分级方法评定相邻节段椎间盘退变情况。结果17例均随访12~41个月(平均19.4个月)。DCI植入节段术前ROM(7.8±2.2)°,末次随访(8.4±2.5)°,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。上下相邻节段术前ROM(8.3±1.9)°、(8.7±2.1)°,末次随访(8.5±2.1)°、(8.8±2.4)°,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。DCI植入节段FSUCobb’s角术前(0.4±5.1)°,末次随访(3.7±5.5)°,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。颈椎整体曲度术前(7.8±11.2)°,末次随访(8.6±10.7)°,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。MRI随访发现34个相邻节段中3个f9%)椎间盘退变分级加重1级,但无相关临床症状出现。结论应用颈椎动态稳定器治疗单节段颈椎病,可以有效改善FSU后凸,恢复颈椎局部前凸,并能较好的保留手术节段、相邻节段及整个颈椎的运动学特性,理论上有利于预防相邻椎间盘的退变,但仍然需要更长期的随访来进一步评估。 Objective To observe the changes of the cervical alignment and range of motion ( ROM ) after single-level dynamic cervical implant ( DCI ) implantation for patients with cervical spondylosis, and to evaluate its safety and efficiency. Methods From August 2009 to January 2012, 17 patients with cervical spondylosis were received and treated according to the indications of DCI implantation, including 4 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 13 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. There were 7 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 43.4 years old ( range; 36-53 years ). The affected segments included C3-4 in 1 case, C4-5 in 6 cases, C5-6 in 6 cases and C6-7 in 4 cases. Anterior cervical disceetomy and DCI implantation after spinal canal decompression were performed on 17 patients. The ROM of DCI implantation segments and adjacent segments preoperatively and in the latest follow-up was measured, as welt as the Cobb's angle of DCI implantation segments at fimctional spinal unit ( FSU ) and the overall cervical alignment Cobb's angle from C2-7. The adjacent segment degeneration was evaluated according to Miyazaki classification of cervical disc degeneration. Results All patients were followed up for a mean period of 19.4 months ( range; 12-41 months ). The ROM of DCI implantation segments was ( 7.8±2.2 )° preoperatively and ( 8.4±2.5 ) ° in the latest follow-up respectively, without statistically significant difference ( P〉0.05 ). The ROM at adjacent segment level was ( 8.3±1.9 ) ° and ( 8.7±2.1 ) ° preoperatively and ( 8.5±2.1 ) ° and ( 8.8±2.4 )° in the latest follow-up respectively, without statistically significant difference ( P〉0.05 ). The Cobb's angle of DCI implantation segments at FSU was ( 0.4±5.1 ) ± preoperatively and ( 3.7±5.5 ) ° in the latest follow-up respectively, with statistically significantdifferences ( P〈0.05 ). The overall cervical alignment Cobb's angle was ( 7.8±11.2 ) ° preoperatively and ( 8.6± 10.7 ) ° in the latest follow-up respectively, without statistically significant difference ( P〉0.05 ). All patients gained MRI follow-up. Disc degeneration up to 1 grade occurred to 3 of 34 ( 9% ) adjacent segments, and no relative clinical symptom appeared. Conclusions DCI in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis can effectively improve FSU kyphosis and recover cervical local lordosis, as well as preserve the kinematics characteristics of operation segments, adjacent segments and the whole cervical spine. Theoretically, DCI is conducive to the prevention of adjacent intervertebral disc degeneration, which still should be further assessed after a long-term follow-up.
出处 《中国骨与关节杂志》 CAS 2013年第10期574-579,共6页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
关键词 颈椎病 随访研究 椎间盘退行性变 脊柱融合术 矫形外科手术 Cervical spondylosis Follow-up studies Intervertebral disc degeneration Spinal fusion Orthopedic procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Smith GW,Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removaI of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1958,(03):607-624.
  • 2Yue WM,Brodner W,Hi ghland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plating:a 5 to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study[J].{H}SPINE,2005,(19):2138-2144.
  • 3Goffin J,Geusens E,Vantomme N. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine[J].{H}Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques,2004,(02):79-85.
  • 4Matsumoto M,Okada E,Ichihara D,et a1. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degereration comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study[J].{H}SPINE,2010,(01):36-43.
  • 5Wilke HJ,Kettler A,Goetz C. Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck ovements:an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage[J].{H}SPINE,2000,(21):2762-2770.
  • 6Park DH,Ramakrishnan P,Cho TH,et a1. Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level[J].{H}Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine,2007,(03):336-340.
  • 7Schwab JS,Diangelo DJ,Foley KT. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion:where does the lost motion go[J].{H}SPINE,2006,(21):2439-2448.
  • 8Gofifn J,Johan VL,Frank VC. Cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan Disc:4-year results[J].{H}SPINE JOURNAL,2006,(Suppl 5):S62-S63.
  • 9Kim SW,Shin JH,Arbatin JJ,et a1. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overalI sagittal balance of the cervical spine[J].{H}European Spine Journal,2008,(01):20-29.
  • 10孙宇,潘胜发,张凤山,张立.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的早期临床观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):85-89. 被引量:44

二级参考文献53

  • 1徐耀增,吕书军,王树金,范诚,董天华.一体化颈椎钢板融合器的临床应用[J].中华创伤杂志,2004,20(10):581-584. 被引量:7
  • 2李勤,田伟,刘波,胡临,李志宇,袁强,韩啸.多节段颈椎人工椎间盘置换术的临床研究[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(17):1173-1176. 被引量:13
  • 3Smith GW, Robinson RA.The treatment of certain cervicalspine disorders by anterior removal of the intewertebrel disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1958;40:607-624.
  • 4Wilke HJ,Kettler A,Goetz C,et al.Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements:an in vitro investigation with a mew cervical fusion cage.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2000; 25(21 ): 2762-2770.
  • 5David T.Long-term results ofone-level lumbar arthroplasty: inimurn 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007;32(6):661-666.
  • 6Yang JY, Song HS,Lee M,et aLAdjacent level ossification development after anterior cervical fusion without plate fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(15):30-33.
  • 7Sugawara T, Itoh Y, Hirano Y, et al.Long term outcome and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages. Acta Neurochir(Wien).2009; 151 (4) 303-309.
  • 8Kasimatis GB,Michopoulou S,Boniatis I,et al.The impact of fusion on adjacent levels in cervical spine injuries: ls it reaUy important? Clin Neurol Neurosurg.2009; 111 (10):816-824.
  • 9Rihn JA,Lawrence J,Gates C,et aI.Adjacent segment disease after cervical spine fusion.lnstr Course Lect.2009;58:747-56.
  • 10Goffin J,Geusens E,Vantomme N,et al.Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.J Spinal Disord Tech.2004; 17(2):79-85.

共引文献69

同被引文献99

  • 1陈林斌,孙晓智,高宇亮.探讨椎间植骨融合内固定术对退行性脊柱侧弯的治疗效果[J].临床研究,2014,22(10):59-59. 被引量:4
  • 2郭功亮,齐兵,曲阳,赵宝林.关节突关节切除范围对下颈椎稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J].生物医学工程研究,2010,29(4):259-262. 被引量:20
  • 3Kalfas IH. Role of corpectomy in cervical spondylosis.Neurosurg Focus. 2002;12:E11.
  • 4Hilibrancf AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration andadjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinalfusion?. Spine J. 2004:4(6): S190-S194.
  • 5Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA. Adjacent segment degenerationfollowing spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Bull NYUHosp Jt Dis. 2007;65(1):29-36.
  • 6Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, et al. Results of theprospective, randomized, multicenter food and drugadministration investigational device exemption study of theProDisc?~L total disc replacement versus circumferentialfusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.Spine. 2007;32(11): 1155-1162.
  • 7Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathyand Myelopathy at Segments Adjacent to the Site of aPrevious Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg.1999;81(4): 519-528.
  • 8Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Anterior cervical discectomy andfusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion formultilevel cervical spondylosis: a systematic review. ArchOrthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(2): 155-161.
  • 9Mummaneni PV, Haid RW. The future in the care of thecervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty: Invitedsubmission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of theSpine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine.2004,1(2): 155-159.
  • 10Li Z, Yu S, Zhao Y, et al. Clinical and radiologic comparison ofdynamic cervical implant arthroplasty versus anterior cervicaldiscectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervicaldegenerative disc disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(6):942-948.

引证文献7

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部