摘要
通过归纳梳理沪、苏、浙等长三角地区政府购买居家养老服务的实践经验,本文划分出政府向准社会组织、向社会组织、向市场组织非竞争购买及向各类组织竞争性购买四种运行机制,四类机制在购买程序、购买方式、服务主体、政府职能、运行绩效及存在问题等方面存在一定差异。在深入比较的基础上,结合多学科理论,阐明地方政府优化公共服务购买机制的关键点及其实现条件。由点及面,最终提出完善城市公共服务政府购买机制的对策措施,以确保机制运行的公平性、有效性和持续性。
This paper summarizes four competitive mechanisms that local governments procure home-based cares from social organi- zations, quasi social organizations, monopolistic private organizations, and private competitive organizations in the Yangtze River Delta re- gion. There exist some differences in the procurement procedure, the transaction method, the target customer, the government function the operation performance, and the potential disadvantage among these four procurement mechanisms. We illustrate keys and precondi- tions for local governments to optimize the procurement mechanism of public services. And finally we give polices to improve the public- service procurement mechanism for the fairness, the efficiency and the sustainability of public services.
出处
《上海行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期53-62,共10页
The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
基金
2012年浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题"地方政府购买公共服务的机制优化研究"
课题编号:12XKGJ16
2013年浙江省民政厅重大委托课题"政府购买居家养老服务的机制比较及其优化研究--基于浙
沪
苏的实践调查"
课题编号:ZMWT201309
关键词
公共服务
购买机制
类型比较
机制优化
Public Services
Procurement Mechanisms
Pattern Comparison, Mechanism Optimization
