摘要
对客观实证论与主观建构论视域下的历史事实、客观实证论与主观建构论的理论缺陷,以及历史的真实性是否存在等问题进行了分析与论述。认为客观实证论与主观建构论的观点尽管各有其合理性,但是又各有缺陷;客观实证论者认为历史事实是等待着史学家去发现的客观的独立存在,历史事实等同于历史真实,这种观点排除了历史事实中的各种主观因素对历史真实性的影响;主观建构论者认为历史事实含有主观性与相对性,这一观点容易导致对历史知识的全盘怀疑主义;史学家的"自治"和"技艺"、共同的学术规范和学科训练以及相对客观的历史事件和史料的制约等,都在某种程度上维护和保证了历史的相对真实性。
The problems like historical facts under the perspective of metaethical objeetivism and subjective constructionism, the theoretical defects of metaethical objectivism and subjective constructionism as well as the existence of historical authenticity are expounded and analyzed. It is considered that the perspectives of them have their rationality, but they all have flaws. Metaethical objectivist thinks that the historical facts is objective and wait for historians to find, historical facts can equal to historical truths~ this viewpoint excludes the impact of a variety of subjective factors on historical authenticity in historical facts. Subjective Constructivist argues that historical facts contain subjectivity and relativity, this view easily lead to the overall skepticism of historical knowledge. Historians＇ self-rule, the common academic standards and academic training and relatively objective historical events, can ensure the relative truth of history.
出处
《沈阳大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第5期633-636,共4页
Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science
关键词
历史事实
历史真实
客观实证论
主观建构论
historical facts
historical truths
metaethical objectivism
subjective constructionism
