摘要
违法性判断在整个法领域应当统一理解,还是在不同法领域可以分别加以理解,牵涉"问题的思考"与"体系的思考"之结合,是一个具有争议的理论问题。刑法被认为是最后保障法,但这并不意味着其在违法性判断上对民法等"前置法"具有依从性从而只能一元地进行。通过剖析刑民实体关系,可以看出:刑法中行为类型所具有的独特的"不法量域"使"可罚的违法性"难以独立考量;民法中违法性判断的暧昧不清使其难以为刑法所参照;维系刑民违法判断一元的所谓"一般的违法性"概念存在缺陷。法秩序统一性的真义是价值评判上、公理上的一致性。不同法领域立法旨趣的差异与作为评判对象行为的多面性,共同决定了对刑法违法性可以作相对判断。
Whether illegality judgment should be understood uniformly in the entire area of the law or respectively in different areas of the law is an extremely controversial theoretical issue,for its involvement in the combination of 'issue thinking' and 'system thinking'.The criminal law is considered to be the last security law.Does it mean the compliance on the 'front law' such as the civil law thus must be monistically conducted in illegality judgment? By analyzing the substantive relationship between the criminal law and the civil law,we can conclude;behavior type in the criminal law has a unique 'quantity range of illegality',which makes 'punishable illegality ' have no independent space to be considered;illegality judgment in the civil law is ambiguous,which makes it difficult to have reference role to the criminal law's judgment;so-called 'general illegality' which maintains monistic illegality judgment has major shortcomings.The real meaning of legal order's unity is a consistency in the sense of value judging and axiom.Legislative intewt's diversity in different areas of the law and multi-faceted nature of behavior as judgment object jointly determine the illegality in the criminal law can be relatively judged.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期131-147,179,共17页
The Jurist
基金
教育部人文社科青年基金项目"法秩序的统一性与违法判断的相对性"(项目编号:12YJC820101)的研究成果之一
