摘要
目的:对比分析腹腔镜免钉合经腹部分腹膜外网片植入术(transabdominal partial extraperitoneal,TAPE)与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)的并发症及临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2007年7月至2010年6月为38例患者行免钉合TAPE(TAPE组)及为65例患者行TAPP(TAPP组)的临床资料,对比两组手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scales,VAS)及3年复发率。结果:两组患者手术时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);住院时间、住院费用、术后1周VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后半年TAPE组及TAPP组VAS评分分别为(0.37±0.13)分及(1.62±0.44)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);3年复发率分别为2.63%、3.08%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:免钉合TAPE及TAPP治疗腹股沟疝均是安全、有效的,免钉合TAPE在缩短手术时间及减少慢性疼痛方面具有一定优势。
Objective: To compare the complications and efficiency of laparoscopic transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique without stapling with transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique in inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods :The av- erage operation time, hospital stay time, hospitalization expenses, visual analogue scales (VAS) of chronic pain and 3 year recurrent rates were analyzed retrospectively between 38 cases of inguinal hernia which underwent laparoscopic TAPE without stapling and 65 ca- ses of inguinal hernia which underwent TAPP during Jnl. 2007 and Jun. 2010 in Shanghai East Hospital. Results:As to TAPE group and TAPP group, the average operation time was (51.20 -+ 11.58 ) min and (67.42 _+ 19.66 ) min respectively ( P 〈 O. 05 ), the average hospital stay was (3.13 ~ O. 11 ) d and (3.28 ~ O. 30) d respectively ( P 〉 O. 05 ), the hospitalization expenses was ( 14 350 + 936 ) RMB and ( 14 193 ~ 1 722) RMB respectively ( P 〉 0.05 ), the average VAS of pain one week after operation was ( 2.82 ~ 0.54) and (3.47 ~0.61 ) respectively (P 〉0.05) ,the average VAS of pain 6 months after operation was (0.37 ~0.13) and ( 1.62 +0.44) re- spectively ( P 〈 0.01 ), and the 3 year recurrent rate was 2.63% and 3.08% respectively ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions: Both TAPE with- out stapling and TAPP are safe and effective for inguinal hernia. TAPE without stapling may have some advantages in operation time and chronic pain comparing with TAPP.
出处
《腹腔镜外科杂志》
2013年第10期725-727,共3页
Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词
疝
腹股沟
疝修补术
腹腔镜检查
疗效比较研究
Hernia, inguinal
Hemion'haphy
Laparoscopy
Comparative effectiveness research