期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

心肌血流储备分数在冠脉多支病变介入治疗中的应用 被引量：14

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析心肌血流储备分数(FFR)在冠状动脉多支血管病变的介入治疗中的指导价值及其临床预后。方法:回顾性分析65例冠脉造影(CAG)显示多支血管病变患者的临床资料,分为单纯CAG指导进行PCI组(A组,43例)和FFR指导行PCI组(B组,22例),分析比较两组的支架植入数量、造影剂用量及随访6个月主要不良心血管事件的发生率。结果:两组相比,B组较A组支架植入数量明显减少[(1.4±0.8)个vs.(2.5±1.1)个,P<0.05],造影剂用量更少[(173.4±85.7)mL vs.(271.8±106.1)mL,P<0.05],经6个月随访,B组主要不良心血管事件发生率低于A组(13.6%vs.20.9%,P>0.05)。结论:该研究表明,FFR指导的PCI治疗安全有效,在提高多支血管病变患者预后的同时,明显减少了不必要的支架植入。
作者 高丽华 陈欣 卢成志 张淑翼
机构地区 天津医科大学一中心临床学院 天津市第一中心医院心内科
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第21期3544-3546,共3页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 心肌血流储备分数 多支血管病变 冠状动脉造影
分类号 R543 [医药卫生—心血管疾病]
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1吕树铮,汪国忠.冠心病多支病变的血管重建治疗的选择PCI还是CABG[J].中国心血管杂志,2009,14(2):86-87. 被引量：2
  • 2Melikian N, Cuisset T, Hamilos M, et al. Fractional flowreserve-the influence of the collateral circulation[J]. Int JCardiol, 2009,132(3):109-110.
  • 3Christou M A, Siontis G C, Kat rit sis D G, et al. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronaryangiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation ofmyocardial ischemia[J]. Am J Cardiol,2007,99(4):450-456.
  • 4Sahinarslan A, Kocaman S A,Olgun H, et al. The reliability ofractional flow reserve measurement in patient s wit h diabetesmellitus[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2009,20(5):317-321.
  • 5王焱,肖国胜.多支血管病变的功能性血运重建[J].中国心血管杂志,2012,17(6):406-408. 被引量：8
  • 6Sant' Anna F M, Silva E E, Batista LA,et al. Influence ofroutine assessment of fractional flow reserve on decision makingduring coronary interventions[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2007,99(4):504-508.
  • 7Chamuleau S A, Meuwissen M, Koch K T, et al. Usefulnessof fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients withmultivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2002,89(4):377-380.
  • 8Berger A, Botman K J, MacCarthy PA,et al. Long-termclinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guidedpercutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivesseldisease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46(3):438-442.
  • 9Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V,et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versusconventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2005,96(7):877-884.
  • 10Tonino PA,De Bruyne B, Pijls N H, et al. Fractional flowreserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronaryintervention[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,360(3):213-224.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Rastan AJ, Walther T, Falk V, et al. Does reasonable incomplete surgical revascularization affect early or long-term survival in patients with muhivessel coronary artery disease receiving left internal mammary artery bypass to left anterior descending artery? Circulation, 2009, 120(11 Suppl) : S70-77.
  • 2Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360: 213-224.
  • 3Kirschbaum SW, Springeling T, Boersma E, et al. Complete percutaneous revascularization for multivessel disease in patients with impaired left ventricular function: pre- and post-procedural evaluation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coil Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3: 392-400.
  • 4De Bruyne B. Multivessel disease: from reasonably incomplete to functionally complete revascularization. Circulation, 2012, 125: 2557 -2559.
  • 5Boden WE,O' Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356: 1503-1516.
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360: 961- 972.
  • 7Sant'Anna FM,Silva EE, Batista LA, et al. Influence of routine assessment of fractional flow reserve on decision Making during coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol, 2007,99 : 504-508.
  • 8Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 90: 210-215.
  • 9Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2007, 49: 2105-2111.
  • 10Pijls NH, Sels JW. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2012, 59: 1045-1057.

共引文献8

同被引文献107

  • 1邵静波,季祥武,张爱元,伦增瑞,韩晓丽.介入术后股动脉假性动脉瘤的处理[J].现代诊断与治疗,2006,17(2):108-109. 被引量：5
  • 2Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5 years follow - up of the DEFER study [ J]. J Am Coil Cariol, 2007, 49 (21) : 2105 -2111.
  • 3Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary - artery stenoses [J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334 (26) : 1703 -1708.
  • 4Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? [J]. Eur Heart J, 2003, 24 (9): 789-800.
  • 5Joutsiniemi E, Saraste A, Pietila M, et al. Resting coronary flow velocity in the functional evalution of coronary artery stenosis : study on sequential use of computed tomography angiography and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography [ J ]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,2012, 13 (1): 79-85.
  • 6Ammann P, Brunner - La Rocca HP, Angehrn W, et al. Procedural complications following diagnostic coronary angiography are related to the operator's experience and the catheter size [ J ]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 59 (1) : 13 -18.
  • 7Dias CC, Mateus P, Bettencourt N, et al. Value of frational flow reserve in the management of patients with moderate coronary stenosis [J]. Rev Port Cardil, 2004, 23 (11) : 1409 -1416.
  • 8Melikian N, Del Furia F, Di Mario C. Physiologic lesion assessment during percutaneous coronary intervention [ J ]. Cardiol Clin, 2010, 28 (1) : 31 -54.
  • 9Ski CF, Thompson DR. Quality of life in cardiovascular disease: what is it and why and how should we measure it? [ J ]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2010, 9 (4): 201-202.
  • 10Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. NEnglJMed, 2009, 360 (3): 213-224.

引证文献14

二级引证文献79

实用医学杂志
2013年 第21期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部